A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of microbial communities in a dairy farm from a food safety perspective. | LitMetric

Assessment of microbial communities in a dairy farm from a food safety perspective.

Int J Food Microbiol

School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA. Electronic address:

Published: October 2024

Microbial communities associated with dairy farm operations have a significant influence on food safety, dairy product quality, and animal health. This study aimed to create a microbial mapping at a dairy farm to learn about their bacterial diversity, distribution, and potential dissemination pathways. The investigation included the detection of key zoonotic pathogens, enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli as indicators of typical bacterial loads in a dairy production environment, and a microbiome analysis using metagenomics. A total of 160 samples (environmental, udder swabs, feed, feces, raw milk, and water) were collected during winter (N = 80) and spring (N = 80). In winter, Cronobacter spp. were detected in four feed and two water samples; L. monocytogenes was identified in two samples, one from feces and one from a cattle mat; E. coli O157:H7 was found in two feed samples. On the other hand, during spring, Cronobacter spp. were present in four feed samples and one hallway drain, with only one feed sample testing positive for E. coli O157:H7, while L. monocytogenes was absent during the spring season. Regarding microbial counts, there was no significant difference between the two seasons (p = 0.068) for S. aureus; however, a significant difference (p = 0.025) was observed for E. coli. Environmental microbiome analysis showed the presence of Proteobacteria (46.0 %) and Firmicutes (27.2 %) as the dominant phyla during both seasons. Moraxellaceae (11.8 %) and Pseudomonadaceae (10.62 %) were notable during winter, while Lactobacillaceae (13.0 %) and Enterobacteriaceae (12.6 %) were prominent during spring. These findings offer valuable insights into microbial distribution within a dairy farm and potential risks to animal and human health through environmental cross-contamination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110827DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dairy farm
16
microbial communities
8
food safety
8
microbiome analysis
8
cronobacter spp
8
coli o157h7
8
feed samples
8
dairy
6
samples
5
feed
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!