AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on reducing the "wastage rate" of blood components, which is the amount discarded compared to total collections, examining various factors affecting quality control and usability.
  • An audit conducted over four 16-month cycles involved analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs), identifying issues, implementing corrective actions, and evaluating their effectiveness using statistical methods.
  • As a result, the overall discard rate decreased from about 5% to 3%, demonstrating that systematic improvements in processes can effectively enhance blood component management and quality.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The rate of discarded blood components or "wastage rate" reflects on the whole process, preparation, and production of blood and its quality control. It is the ratio of blood and blood components discarded to the total number of collections. The discard or unusability of blood products are many, and the ones that can be monitored and regarded as indicators to be improvised on are QC failure rate, transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) positivity, and component discards (other than TTI), including those that caused transfusion reactions. These were studied over four intervention cycles to see if they could be improved.

Materials And Methods: This was a clinical audit and quality improvement study. The clinical audit was conducted over four cycles over 16 months. Each cycle included three stages wherein the data required for calculating those key performance indicators (KPIs) of the blood center were studied and analyzed, and causes for the poorly performing ones were identified; a corrective plan was drawn and implemented, followed by data collection and interpretation of the same in the next cycle for improvement. The data were compiled using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA).

Results: The overall discard rates due to all cumulative causes mentioned were at about 5% at the start of the first cycle. The various factors comprising preparatory, preparation, and the management of inventory and issue were analyzed, and corrective interventions were performed in every cycle. The discard rates were reduced to about 3% by the end of the four cycles. The difference was statistically significant, with a < 0.05.

Conclusion: The implementation of Corrective and preventive action measures can rectify the deviations in KPIs. The blood center director, staff, and doctors should be responsible for maintaining and continuously improving the quality indicators.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259350PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood components
12
blood center
12
blood
9
corrective preventive
8
quality improvement
8
improvement study
8
clinical audit
8
kpis blood
8
discard rates
8
audit-based corrective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!