Objective: Define current practices and protocols in surgical training programs for pregnant trainees.
Study Design: Cross sectional.
Setting: Academic surgical training programs in the United States.
Methods: A validated 20-question survey was sent via email to program directors and coordinators of US surgical training programs, including otolaryngology head & neck surgery (OHNS), plastic surgery, vascular surgery, and general surgery. The survey was issued in November and December 2022 and data were collected until January 2023. This study was approved for exemption by the Minimal Risk Research IRB at the University of Wisconsin Madison (ID number 2022-1370).
Results: Surveys were emailed to 608 surgical programs, and the response rate was 23.5% (143/608) including 45 OHNS programs. When asked if their program has a policy in place for pregnant trainees, 84.4% responded yes, and 82.4% responded that they were satisfied with their policy. Subsequent questions addressed individual policies and risk factors facing pregnant trainees. 60.3% of programs report providing protected time off for miscarriages. Only 36.9% provide information to pregnant trainees regarding workplace exposures that pose a risk of fetal anomaly or miscarriage. Only 47.1% incorporate rest breaks for pregnant trainees, and only 20% protect the number of hours a pregnant trainee operates per week. 24.2% adjust overnight shifts or call schedules for pregnant trainees, and of those that adjust call shifts, 20% require pregnant trainees to "make up" these missed call shifts. Less than half (40%) of programs have a contingency plan in place for supporting nonchild-bearing residents who may take on the work of their colleagues during pregnancy or postpartum.
Conclusion: While a majority of training programs report a pregnancy policy in place for trainees, most of these policies appear to be severely deficient in addressing critical aspects of surgical training that place both fetus and mother at significant risk of complications. This data indicates a need for a safe pregnancy protocol in order to protect both surgeon and fetus.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260283 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.172 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Port-Royal Maternity, Cochin Hospital, Paris Cité University, APHP, Paris, France.
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the performance of two different obstetric ultrasound simulators in assessing the practical skills of trainees compared to the standard method of practical assessment conducted on pregnant women volunteers.
Methods: We performed a prospective observational study. Two simulators were compared: the Simbionix simulator which uses a mannequin and heteroevaluation and the OPUS simulator which uses optical positioning technology with automatic assessment.
Surgery
January 2025
Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address:
Background: With more women entering surgical training, barriers concerning pregnancy and breastfeeding are pertinent issues that have not been addressed adequately in a specialty with more men. An increasing body of evidence for the consequences of these challenges is emerging but has not been reviewed thoroughly. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the physical, emotional, and practical challenges of pregnancy and breastfeeding during surgical training and career and to elucidate the main difficulties and barriers female surgeons experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Educ
December 2024
Department of Ultrasonography, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No. 53 Xiangchun Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of AI-based approaches with manual approaches in ultrasound image quality control (QC).
Methods: Eligible ultrasonographers and pregnant volunteers were prospectively recruited from the Hunan Maternal and Child Health Hospital in May 2023. The ultrasonographers were randomly and evenly assigned to either the AI or Manual QC groups with baseline scores determined in June-July.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol
November 2024
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
MedEdPORTAL
November 2024
Maternal Fetal Medicine Division Director, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the MetroHealth System and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!