The auditory stimulus facilitates memory guidance in distractor suppression in males with substance use disorder.

Front Psychol

Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers studied how working memory impacts the ability to ignore distractions during visual tasks, focusing on individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and their cognitive control challenges.
  • The study utilized a dual-task approach, where participants memorized color words while performing a search task, examining the effects of congruent auditory information during memory encoding.
  • Results showed that the control group had a faster response when the memory matched distractors, while both groups benefited from audiovisual cues, with SUD patients showing delayed facilitation, highlighting differences in distraction processing strategies.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Representations in working memory can affect distractor suppression in human visual search, and this process is modulated by a separate top-down cognitive control. An increasing body of research has demonstrated that patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have deficits in cognitive control over filtering interference by perceptual distractors. However, their ability to resist proactive interference from working memory has received comparatively less attention.

Methods: Here, we investigate this issue by employing a working memory/visual search dual-task paradigm. An intervening gap-location search task was instructed to be performed while participants memorized a written color word, with congruent auditory information present during the memory encoding phase on half of the trials.

Results: Results showed that there was a reliable response time (RT) advantage when the meaning of the memory sample agreed with the color of one of the distractors under the visual alone condition. However, such a result was only found in the control group. More importantly, both groups exhibited comparable facilitation under the audiovisual condition, with the facilitation effect appearing later in the SUD group. Furthermore, the facilitation effect was superior in magnitude and time course under the audiovisual condition to the visual alone condition.

Discussion: These findings highlight how patients with SUD resist distractor interference at the memory level and extend our understanding of how working memory, selective attention, and audiovisual enhancement interact to optimize perceptual decisions in patients with SUD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259375PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417557DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

working memory
12
distractor suppression
8
substance disorder
8
cognitive control
8
audiovisual condition
8
patients sud
8
memory
7
auditory stimulus
4
stimulus facilitates
4
facilitates memory
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!