Comparison of the Efficacy of Complete Endoscopic and Microscopic Vascular Decompression in the Treatment of Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Objective: To compare whether there is a difference in the efficacy of complete endoscopic microvascular decompression (EVD) and microscopic microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN).

Methods: From January 2014 to January 2021, 297 CTN patients were assigned to the retrosigmoid approach EVD (138 cases) and the MVD groups (159 cases); to compare whether there are differences in the pain control rate, recurrence, complications of CTN patients between the 2operations, and separately predict the factors related to prognosis of both groups.

Results: There was no significant difference in painless rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery (P = 0.356, P = 0.853, P = 1), and overall incidence of complications (P = 0.058) between the EVD and MVD groups. The EVD group had shorter surgical decompression duration than the MVD group (P < 0.001). The painless rate of patients with vertebrobasilar trigeminal neuralgia in the EVD group was higher than that in the MVD group, but the difference was not statistically significant (90% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.058). The independent risk factors associated with a good prognosis in the EVD group were a shorter course of the disease and severe neurovascular conflict, while severe neurovascular conflict is the only independent risk factor associated with a good prognosis in the MVD group.

Conclusions: For CTN patients, compared with traditional MVD, EVD is also safe and effective and has the advantage of shorter decompression time.The predictive results of prognostic factors also suggest that CTN patients may benefit more from early surgical treatment.