Factors Affecting the Activation and Appearances of Epileptiform Abnormalities in Routine Electroencephalography by Different Provocation Methods.

Objective: The objective of this study was to observe the effects of various clinical factors on the activation and appearance of epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) in routine electroencephalography (rEEG) by different provocation methods.

Methods: This observational study involved a review of 136 patients presented for EEG recording due to various indications and their EEG showing EAs during various provocation methods.

Results: Generalized spike-wave discharges (GSWDs) were the most frequent activated epileptiform pattern observed in, 81 (59.1%) recordings. This pattern was seen mainly in females 49 (P = 0.00), in patients with generalized seizures 48 (P = 0.00), in prolonged EEG records 3 (P = 0.03), and in both genetic 35 (P = 0.00) and lesional epilepsies 21 (P = 0.00). Focal sharp waves with bilateral synchrony (FSWSBS) were the most activated ictal pattern (P = 0.00). Ictal EAs after hyperventilation (HV) (P = 0.03) and intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) (P = 0.01) were mainly observed in patients with uncontrolled seizures (P = 0.00), and immune-mediated epilepsy (P = 0.02). Females sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-2.6; P = 0.25), bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR: 1.17, CI: 0.5-2.4; P = 0.31) and lesional epilepsies (OR: 1.45, CI: 0.7-2.9; P = 0.20) had risk of activation of EAs by provocation methods; however this risk was not statistically significant. While sleep deprivation (SD) (OR: 6.33, CI: 2.2-18.2; P = 0.00), nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM) (OR: 2.41, CI: 1.0-5.4; P = 0.00), and prolong EEG recording (OR: 1.91, CI: 0.9-3.9; P = 0.04) were leading to a statistically significant risk of activation and appearances of EAs due to provocation.

Conclusion: Different provocation methods can activate and augment the variety of EEG patterns of diverse clinical significance. Detection of activated ictal EAs is dependent on various patient factors, including seizure control, and the provocation method applied. Further larger prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.