AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of hybrid emergency room systems (HERSs) in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing them to conventional emergency care methods.
  • It analyzed data from 83 patients who received endovascular therapy, focusing on treatment timing and neurological outcomes after 30 days.
  • While HERS showed shorter treatment times (door-to-puncture and door-to-recanalization), there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients achieving favorable neurological outcomes between HERS and conventional groups.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Hybrid emergency room systems (HERSs) have shown promise for the management of severe trauma by reducing mortality. However, the effectiveness of HERSs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of HERSs on treatment duration and neurological outcomes in patients with AIS undergoing endovascular therapy.

Materials And Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 83 patients with AIS who were directly transported to our emergency department and underwent endovascular treatment between June 2017 and December 2023. Patients were divided into the HERS and conventional groups based on the utilization of HERSs. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 30 days. The secondary outcomes included door-to-puncture and door-to-recanalization times. Univariate analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate.

Results: Of the 83 eligible patients, 50 (60.2%) were assigned to the HERS group and 33 (39.8%) to the conventional group. The median door-to-puncture time was significantly shorter in the HERS group than in the conventional group (99.5 vs. 131 min;  = 0.001). Similarly, the median door-to-recanalization time was significantly shorter in the HERS group (162.5 vs. 201.5 min,  = 0.018). Favorable neurological outcomes were achieved in 16/50 (32.0%) patients in the HERS group and 6/33 (18.2%) in the conventional group. The HERS and conventional groups showed no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving favorable neurological outcomes ( = 0.21).

Conclusion: Implementation of the HERS significantly reduced the door-to-puncture and door-to-recanalization times in patients with AIS undergoing endovascular therapy. Despite these reductions in treatment duration, no significant improvement in neurological outcomes was observed. Further research is required to optimize patient selection and treatment strategies to maximize the benefits of the HERS in AIS management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256194PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1420951DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neurological outcomes
16
patients ais
12
favorable neurological
12
conventional group
12
hybrid emergency
8
emergency room
8
acute ischemic
8
ischemic stroke
8
herss treatment
8
treatment duration
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!