Objectives: This work aims to determine the efficacy and safety of preoperative alpha-blocker therapy on ureteroscopy (URS) outcomes.
Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of URS with or without preoperative alpha-blocker therapy, outcomes included the need for ureteral dilatation, stone access failure, procedure time, residual stone rate, hospital stay, and complications. Residual stone rates were reported with and without adjustments for spontaneous stone passage, medication noncompliance, or adverse events leading to patient withdrawal. Data were analysed using random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
Results: Among 15 randomised trials with 1653 patients, URS was effective and safe with a stone-free rate of 81.2% and rare (2.3%) serious complications. The addition of preoperative alpha-blockers reduced the need for ureteral dilatation (risk ratio [RR] = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.75; = 0.002), access failure rate (RR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.57; < 0.001), procedure time (mean difference [MD] = -6 min; 95% CI = -8 to -3; < 0.001), risk of residual stone in the primary (RR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.66; < 0.001) and adjusted (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.68; < 0.001) analyses, hospital stay (MD = -0.3 days; 95% CI = -0.4 to -0.1; < 0.001), and complication rate (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.59; < 0.001). Alpha-blockers increased ejaculatory dysfunction risk and were less effective for renal/proximal ureter stones. The certainty of evidence was high or moderate for all outcomes. The main limitation of the review was inconsistency in residual stone assessment methods.
Conclusion: While URS is an effective and safe treatment for stone disease, preoperative alpha-blocker therapy is well tolerated and can further improve patient outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249831 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.358 | DOI Listing |
Glob Ment Health (Camb)
November 2024
Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions for men in humanitarian settings is limited. Moreover, engagement and retention of men in such interventions has been challenging. Adaptations may therefore be required to improve the appropriateness and acceptability of these interventions for men.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlob Ment Health (Camb)
December 2024
Mental Health Education and Counseling Center, China University of Labor Relations, Beijing, China.
Background: Psychodrama (PD), supported by extensive global research, is increasingly becoming a vital method for alleviating psychological symptoms and promoting mental well-being in diverse populations across China. However, comprehensive evidence based on rigorous interventions is currently lacking.
Methods: This article systematically reviews the literature on randomized controlled experimental intervention studies of PD in the Chinese Mainland from 1982 to 2023.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
December 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Introduction: When a child has a disability, their families face significant challenges that also impact parents' and siblings' mental health and adjustment. We examined the potential bidirectional relationships between parental mental health and sibling mental health and adjustment in families of children with a disability.
Methods: We utilized baseline and 12-month follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention designed to enhance parent-sibling communication in families of children with a disability.
Can J Kidney Health Dis
January 2025
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background: Hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy (HIRRT) is a common complication affecting critically ill patients that require renal replacement therapy (RRT). There is currently no consensus regarding the definition of HIRRT in critically ill patients. In this context, the impacts of HIRRT on clinical outcomes such as mortality or renal recovery in critically ill patients are unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!