Meta-analysis of the value of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, People's Republic of China.

Published: July 2024

Background: This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

Methods: The literature search was performed up to December 8, 2023, and included a comprehensive examination of several databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Diagnostic metrics sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were determined using a bivariate model analysis. Heterogeneity within the data was explored through subgroup analyses, which considered variables including geographical region, use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), arthroscopy, and study design.

Results: The analysis included ten studies encompassing 544 patients. DECT demonstrated substantial diagnostic utility for ACL injuries of the knee, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.94), a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.95), a PLR of 9.20 (95% CI: 4.50-19.00), a NLR of 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14), a DOR of 97.00 (95% CI: 35.00-268.00), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The subgroup analyses consistently showed high diagnostic precision for ACL injuries across Asian population (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.91, PLR: 9.90, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 105.00, AUC: 0.96), in MRI subgroup (sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.94, PLR: 9.57, NLR: 0.18, DOR: 56.00, AUC: 0.93), in arthroscopy subgroup (sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.89, PLR: 8.40, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 94.00, AUC: 0.95), for prospective studies (sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.88, PLR: 7.40, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 78.00, AUC: 0.95), and for retrospective studies (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.93, AUC: 0.93).

Conclusion: DECT exhibits a high value in diagnosing ACL injuries. The significant diagnostic value of DECT provides clinicians with a powerful tool that enhances the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis and optimizes patient management and treatment outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256425PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07632-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acl injuries
12
sensitivity 091
12
auc 095
12
nlr 009
12
009 dor
12
dual-energy computed
8
computed tomography
8
diagnosis anterior
8
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!