The diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermography in lumbosacral radicular pain: a prospective study.

J Orthop Surg Res

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Pinghai Road NO. 899, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how accurate infrared thermography is for diagnosing lumbosacral radicular pain in patients with lower extremity pain.
  • A total of 162 patients participated; 62% were diagnosed with lumbosacral radicular pain, and the temperature differences (ΔT) between painful and non-painful areas showed diagnostic accuracy of 80%.
  • The combination of infrared thermography and a clinical certainty score enhanced diagnostic performance, indicating that infrared thermography is a valuable tool, particularly when traditional assessments are inconclusive.

Article Abstract

Background: To identify the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermography in diagnosing lumbosacral radicular pain.

Methods: Patients sequentially presenting with lower extremity pain were enrolled. A clinical certainty score ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the likelihood of lumbosacral radicular pain, with higher scores indicating higher likelihood. Infrared Thermography scans were performed and the temperature difference (ΔT) was calculated as ΔT = T1 - T2, where T2 represents the skin temperature of the most painful area on the affected limb and T1 represents the skin temperature of the same area on the unaffected limb. Upon discharge from the hospital, two independent doctors diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain based on intraoperative findings, surgical effectiveness, and medical records.

Results: A total of 162 patients were included in the study, with the adjudicated golden standard diagnosis revealing that 101 (62%) patients had lumbosacral radicular pain, while the lower extremity pain in 61 patients was attributed to other diseases. The optimal diagnostic value for ΔT was identified to fall between 0.8℃ and 2.2℃, with a corresponding diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 80%, 89%, and 66% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the clinical certainty score were reported as 69%, 62%, and 79% respectively. Combining the clinical certainty score with ΔT yielded a diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 84%, 77%, and 88% respectively.

Conclusion: Infrared thermography proves to be a highly sensitive tool for diagnosing lumbosacral radicular pain. It offers additional diagnostic value in cases where general clinical evaluation may not provide conclusive results.

Trial Registration: ChiCTR2300078786, 19/22/2023.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253381PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04910-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbosacral radicular
24
diagnostic accuracy
20
radicular pain
20
infrared thermography
16
sensitivity specificity
16
clinical certainty
12
certainty score
12
accuracy sensitivity
12
accuracy infrared
8
diagnosing lumbosacral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!