Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography for assessment of fallopian tube patency in infertile women.

Reprod Biomed Online

HOPE Research Center, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Published: September 2024

Research Question: What is the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), using two-dimensional ultrasound in tubal patency assessment in infertile women compared with laparoscopy with dye chromotubation?

Design: This prospective study was conducted at My Duc Hospital, Vietnam. Infertile women aged 18 years or older, who were scheduled for laparoscopy, were included. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for perception of pain during HyFoSy was used. Laparoscopy was carried out on the same day. Clinicians undertaking laparoscopy were blinded to HyFoSy results. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A sample size of 455 women (n = 910 fallopian tubes) was needed to demonstrate a fluctuation hypothesis, not exceeding 6%, for sensitivity and specificity (power 0.80, two-sided alpha 5%, loss to follow-up 5%).

Results: Between 2019 and 2022, 455 participants were recruited. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography was unsuccessfully carried out in six participants. Two withdrew their consent. Data analysis was conducted on the remaining 447 participants (n = 868 fallopian tubes). The sensitivity and specificity of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography compared with laparoscopy were 0.75 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.79) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.74), respectively. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography gave a positive predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.80) and negative predictive value of 0.68 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.73). A total of 42.8% of women reported a VAS score of no pain. No adverse event was reported.

Conclusion: Compared with laparoscopy with dye chromotubation, two-dimensional HyFoSy is a well-tolerated, reliable technique for assessing tubal patency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hysterosalpingo-foam sonography
20
infertile women
12
compared laparoscopy
12
sensitivity specificity
12
diagnostic accuracy
8
accuracy hysterosalpingo-foam
8
tubal patency
8
laparoscopy dye
8
vas score
8
positive predictive
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) are commonly used tubal patency tests during the fertility work-up. Besides its diagnostic purpose, HSG with oil-based contrast can also be applied for its fertility-enhancing effect, by tubal flushing. HyFoSy is considered as less painful compared with HSG, it lacks exposure to iodinated contrast medium and ionising radiation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography the new gold standard for assessing tubal patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reprod Biomed Online

July 2024

Department of Fertility Medicine, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; INSERM U1256 NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient tolerance of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFosy) compared to other tests for assessing tubal patency, using data from 20 studies published between 2012 and January 2023.
  • - Results showed that HyFosy matched laparoscopy results in 94% of cases and had similar effectiveness to hysterosalpingography (HSG) for identifying tubal patency, but was associated with less pain and side effects.
  • - The authors recommend using HyFosy as a first-line method for assessing tubal patency and stress the importance of updating guidelines to include and standardize this procedure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Question: Does hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) prior to hysterosalpingography (HSG) or HSG prior to HyFoSy affect visible tubal patency when compared HSG or HyFoSy alone?

Summary Answer: Undergoing either HyFoSy or HSG prior to tubal patency testing by the alternative method does not demonstrate a significant difference in visible tubal patency when compared to HyFoSy or HSG alone.

What Is Known Already: HyFoSy and HSG are two commonly used visual tubal patency tests with a high and comparable diagnostic accuracy for evaluating tubal patency. These tests may also improve fertility, although the underlying mechanism is still not fully understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To describe the feasibility of our preliminary outpatient fallopian tube catheterization procedure under 3D vaginal ultrasound (US) guidance followed by highly selective hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) in infertile women diagnosed with proximal tubal obstruction.A prospective trial was conducted from October 2022 to December 2023. 3D vaginal US was used to establish the precise location of the tip of the selective salpingography catheter at the tubal ostium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!