Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the amount of distortion using computer-guided implant surgery with 3D printed surgical guides in limited edentulous spaces.

Materials And Methods: 25 bone level self-tapping implants (Straumann® BL and BLT) were randomly inserted in either distal or intercalary posterior mandibular edentulism using a fully digital protocol and 3D printed surgical guides. Amount of inaccuracy was evaluated after superimposing the 3 coordinates of virtually planned and final implant images, which were obtained using intra-oral scans and scan bodies. Four evaluation parameters were considered: origo-displacement, error depth, apical displacement and angle between the planned and the placed implant.

Results: The average of distortion was 0.71 mm for the origo-displacement, 0.36 mm for the error depth, 0.52 mm for the horizontal displacement and 3.34º for the error angle.

Conclusion: The major reason of exclusion was CBCT artifacts. Results of this study were aligned with the results of previous studies concerning partially edentulous spaces. CAD/CAM manufacturing process did not result in significant distortion whilst the biggest part of distortions originated from the surgical process. The learning curve in computer-guided implant surgery presented an important source of inaccuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252094PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00552-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computer-guided implant
12
implant surgery
12
partially edentulous
8
printed surgical
8
surgical guides
8
error depth
8
accuracy computer-guided
4
implant
4
surgery partially
4
edentulous patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!