Introduction: This prospective, single-arm, crossover pharmacodynamic study assessed the effect of Bayer low-dose enteric-coated aspirin 81 mg tablets (LD EC-ASA) (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) compared to Vazalore low-dose phospholipid-aspirin liquid-filled 81 mg capsules (LD PL-ASA) (PLx Pharma Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA) on platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin reaction units (ARU).

Methods: Forty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Platelet function was evaluated with the VerifyNow™ ARU assay (Werfen, Bedford, MA, USA) and assessed post-initiation of Bayer LD EC-ASA daily for 14 days, with a washout period of 28 days, followed by Vazalore LD PL-ASA daily for 14 days, again followed by ARU testing.

Results: Participants on LD EC-ASA had a mean ARU score of 426, with 19.1% of participants having an ARU > 550; patients on LD PL-ASA derived a mean ARU score of 435, with 14.9% achieving an ARU > 550. There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance (ARU > 550) according to the formulation (Bayer LD EC-ASA vs. Vazalore LD PL-ASA) used. Aspirin resistance was independent of ethnicity regardless of the formulation used. In addition, there were no significant associations between body surface area (BSA) and Bayer LD EC-ASA ARU value (p value 0.788) or Vazalore LD PL-ASA ARU value (p value 0.477). No patients experienced any serious adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance between Bayer LD EC-ASA and Vazalore LD PL-ASA. This dedicated pharmacodynamic study could potentially be informative and applicable for Trinidadian patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Further studies are required to confirm these exploratory findings.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06228820, prospectively registered 1/18/2024.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333668PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-024-00373-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bayer ec-asa
16
vazalore pl-asa
16
aspirin resistance
12
pharmacodynamic study
8
daily 14 days
8
ec-asa aru
8
aru score
8
differences aspirin
8
ec-asa vazalore
8
aspirin
6

Similar Publications

Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Two Aspirin Formulations in the Caribbean: The ARC Study.

Cardiol Ther

September 2024

Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, 2nd Floor, Building #67, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Mt. Hope, Trinidad and Tobago.

Introduction: This prospective, single-arm, crossover pharmacodynamic study assessed the effect of Bayer low-dose enteric-coated aspirin 81 mg tablets (LD EC-ASA) (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) compared to Vazalore low-dose phospholipid-aspirin liquid-filled 81 mg capsules (LD PL-ASA) (PLx Pharma Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA) on platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin reaction units (ARU).

Methods: Forty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Low dose enteric-coated aspirin (EC-ASA) is routinely used for secondary cardiovascular event prevention. However, absorption of EC tablets is poor, which can result in subtherapeutic antiplatelet effects. Phospholipid-aspirin liquid filled capsules (PL-ASA) are a novel FDA-approved immediate-release formulation designed to reduce gastrointestinal (GI) injury by limiting direct contact with the stomach lining.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At the 2019 International Aspirin Foundation Scientific Conference 'Benefits and Risks of Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention', held in Rome, Italy, international experts sought to discuss and debate the optimal antithrombotic strategy for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and to seek agreement around dosing and target populations for aspirin use in primary disease prevention. Getting the best evidence to support real-life decisions in the clinic can be complex, and individualising management in order to balance both the risks and benefits of different disease prevention strategies appears to be the best approach. It is hoped that future decision-making tools and biomarkers will help direct treatments at those most likely to benefit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!