Aim: To explore the challenges experienced by Executive Nurse Directors during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to inform future nursing leadership strategies.
Design: A qualitative research project involving interviews with 21 Executive Nurse Directors from England and Wales.
Methods: Participants were purposively sampled and recruited through Chief Nursing Officers and nursing leadership networks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded online via Teams. Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic reflexive analysis was applied to data analysis.
Results: Executive Nurse Directors played a critical role during the COVID-19 pandemic. Six themes are explored: tensions, and adaptive response to personal leadership styles; uncertainty and support at the board level; responding to national political decision-making; the personal and emotional impact of the role and the sources of effective support; the voice and public profile of nursing; lessons learnt and strategies for future leadership development. Enablers of decision-making included effective multidisciplinary working, freedom from normal organizational constraints, support for innovation, and the development of stronger bonds with colleagues. Barriers to decision-making included limited knowledge of the virus and its impact and lack of guidance, particularly at a national level. Priorities, strategies and actions for recovery include recognizing the emotional impact of being in a high-level decision-making role, protecting staff from burnout and understanding the long-term implications of pandemic work for nurse leaders.
Conclusion: Future strategies for nursing leadership during public health, national and global emergencies are recommended.
Impact: This study contributes to the literature exploring the Executive Nurse Director role and their experiences of leading through the COVID-19 pandemic, and identifies priorities, strategies and actions for recovery and learning for the future of senior leadership.
Reporting Method: The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
Patient Or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.16329 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!