A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The dragonfly technique for trachea closure in temporary tracheostomies. Surgical steps and clinical results. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the Dragonfly suturing technique for closure of temporary tracheotomies, comparing it with traditional methods.
  • A total of 50 patients were assessed, revealing a reduction in tracheal stenosis complications from 24% in the traditional group to 6% in the Dragonfly group, alongside shorter procedure times.
  • The findings suggest that the Dragonfly technique is both effective and safe, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of a new suturing technique called Dragonfly for the closure of temporary tracheotomies. This technique involves placing two sutures during the tracheotomy procedure and leaving them loose and unknotted until the day of skin closure.

Methods: Retrospective case control study. Monocentric study at a department of Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery at a tertiary centre in Italy. A total of 50 patients who underwent temporary tracheotomy between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on the trachea closure method: traditional closure with sutures placed during the skin closure procedure (Group A) and the Dragonfly technique (Group B). The incidence of tracheal stenosis by Computed Tomography (CT), granulation tissue formation, bleeding, procedure duration, patient discomfort were evaluated.

Results: The incidence of tracheal complications and tracheal stenosis was reduced in Group B (6%) compared to Group A (24%). Procedure times (3 min vs. 6 min) durations was significantly shorter. No patients had symptoms of tracheal stenosis at the end of the procedures.

Conclusion: The Dragonfly suturing technique is effective and safe for tracheotomy closure, reducing the incidence of tracheal stenosis and shortening hospitalization duration compared to the traditional method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08821-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tracheal stenosis
16
incidence tracheal
12
dragonfly technique
8
trachea closure
8
closure temporary
8
suturing technique
8
closure
6
tracheal
5
dragonfly
4
technique trachea
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!