AI Article Synopsis

  • Radiation therapy (RT) plays a vital role in cancer treatment but is not well represented in medical exams, leading to inconsistent training for future doctors.
  • An analysis of nearly 4,000 questions from medical licensing exams revealed that only 8.6% focused on oncology, with just 2.6% addressing specific treatment modalities, including RT.
  • The study found that RT questions were significantly less frequently correct compared to systemic therapy (ST) and surgical intervention (SI), suggesting a need for increased emphasis on radiation oncology in medical education.

Article Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical component of multidisciplinary cancer care, but has inconsistent curricular exposure. We characterize the radiation oncology (RO) content on the standardized undergraduate medical examinations by comparing its context and prevalence with other domains in oncology. National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) self-assessments and sample questions for the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Steps 1-3 and NBME clinical science shelf examinations were accessed (n = 3878). Questions were inductively analyzed for content pertaining to oncology and treatment modalities of RT, systemic therapy (ST), and surgical intervention (SI). Questions were coded using USMLE Physician Tasks/Competencies and thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics and analyses using the Kruskal-Wallis test are reported. A total of 337 questions (8.6%) within the USMLE and shelf exams included oncology content, with 101 questions (2.6%) referencing at least one cancer treatment modality (n = 35 RT, 45 ST, 57 SI). Treatment questions were more common on USMLE Step 2 CK (n = 35/101, 32%) compared to Step 1 (n = 23/101, 23%) and Step 3 (n = 8/101, 8%) (p < 0.001). RT was significantly less likely to be the correct answer (2/35, 6%) compared to ST (4/45, 9%) and SI (18/57, 32%) (p = 0.003). Therapeutic oncology questions are uncommon on the examination material, with an under-representation of radiation-related content, and contextual bias favoring surgical approaches. We advocate for greater RO involvement in the content creation of such examinations to help trainees better understand multidisciplinary cancer care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02475-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiation therapy
8
national board
8
board medical
8
medical examiners
8
united states
8
oncology content
8
questions
6
medical
5
analysis oncology
4
oncology radiation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!