Zoonotic pathogens in wild Asian primates: a systematic review highlighting research gaps.

Front Vet Sci

SPHERES, Primatology and Tropical Ecology Group, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Ongoing global changes, such as land conversion for agriculture and urbanization, are increasing human-primate interactions, leading to higher zoonotic disease risks, especially in diverse primate regions like Asia.
  • A systematic review was conducted to identify and document zoonotic pathogens found in wild Asian primates, analyzing variations in pathogen types across different habitats (urban, rural, forest).
  • The review uncovered 183 pathogens across 39 primate species but highlighted a lack of comprehensive studies and biases in research, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary One Health approach to enhance pathogen surveillance and mitigate human-primate disease transmission.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Ongoing global changes, including natural land conversion for agriculture and urbanization, modify the dynamics of human-primate contacts, resulting in increased zoonotic risks. Although Asia shelters high primate diversity and experiences rapid expansion of human-primate contact zones, there remains little documentation regarding zoonotic surveillance in the primates of this region.

Methods: Using the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to compile an inventory of zoonotic pathogens detected in wild Asian primates, while highlighting the coverage of primate species, countries, and pathogen groups surveyed, as well as the diagnostic methods used across the studies. Moreover, we compared the species richness of pathogens harbored by primates across diverse types of habitats classified according to their degree of anthropization (i.e., urban vs. rural vs. forest habitats).

Results And Discussion: Searches of Scopus, PubMed, and the Global Mammal Parasite Database yielded 152 articles on 39 primate species. We inventoried 183 pathogens, including 63 helminthic gastrointestinal parasites, two blood-borne parasites, 42 protozoa, 45 viruses, 30 bacteria, and one fungus. Considering each study as a sample, species accumulation curves revealed no significant differences in specific richness between habitat types for any of the pathogen groups analyzed. This is likely due to the insufficient sampling effort (i.e., a limited number of studies), which prevents drawing conclusive findings. This systematic review identified several publication biases, particularly the uneven representation of host species and pathogen groups studied, as well as a lack of use of generic diagnostic methods. Addressing these gaps necessitates a multidisciplinary strategy framed in a One Health approach, which may facilitate a broader inventory of pathogens and ultimately limit the risk of cross-species transmission at the human-primate interface. Strengthening the zoonotic surveillance in primates of this region could be realized notably through the application of more comprehensive diagnostic techniques such as broad-spectrum analyses without selection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238137PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1386180DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
12
pathogen groups
12
zoonotic pathogens
8
wild asian
8
asian primates
8
zoonotic surveillance
8
surveillance primates
8
primate species
8
diagnostic methods
8
zoonotic
5

Similar Publications

Systematic Literature Review of Access Pathways to Drugs for Patients with Rare Diseases.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

December 2024

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Level 5, Building 20, 100 Broadway, Chippendale, Sydney, NSW, 2008, Australia.

Objective: This article reviews the assessment pathways that have been implemented worldwide to facilitate access to drugs for patients with rare diseases.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct a systematic literature review. The Ovid (Embase/MEDLINE), Cochrane, Web of Science, Econlit, National Institute of Health Research, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment databases were searched.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative safety of different first-line treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ann Hematol

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cancer Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, 212 Yuhua East Road, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.

The first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has recently undergone major changes, and targeted therapies have ushered in a new era of CLL/SLL treatment. Scientists in different countries have successively analyzed the efficacy of various drugs, but safety studies are relatively insufficient. Therefore, this systematic evaluation and retrospective meta-analysis was conducted to compare the differences in adverse effects and their incidence among first-line treatment regimens for CLL/SLL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For the first time, critical review on R. Br. (Boraginaceae) is established.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To examine the effects of leisure participation on mental health for middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities.

Materials And Methods: A systematic review conducted in March-May 2022 with an updated search in February 2024 retrieved data from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria included a study population with a mean age ≥45 years and with physical disability, and original, peer-reviewed literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: The use of prebiotics and probiotics as a treatment for psychiatric conditions has gained interest due to their potential to modulate the gut-brain axis. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety in psychiatric populations.

Objective: The aim was to comprehensively review and appraise the effectiveness of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic interventions in reducing clinical depression and anxiety symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!