The choice of maintenance anesthetic during cardiopulmonary bypass has been a subject of ongoing debate. Systematic reviews on the topic have so far failed to demonstrate a difference between volatile agents and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in terms of mortality, myocardial injury, and neurological outcomes. Studies using animal models and noncardiac surgical populations suggest numerous mechanisms whereby TIVA has been associated with more favorable outcomes. However, even if the different anesthetic methods are assumed to equivalent in terms of patient outcomes in the context of cardiac surgery, additional factors, namely variables of occupational exposure and environmental impact, strongly support the preferred use of TIVA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total intravenous
8
intravenous anesthesia
8
volatile agents
8
cardiac surgery
8
anesthesia preferred
4
preferred volatile
4
agents cardiac
4
surgery choice
4
choice maintenance
4
maintenance anesthetic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!