Solid-State NMR C sensitivity at high magnetic field.

J Magn Reson

Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison (NMRFAM), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address:

Published: August 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Sensitivity is crucial for NMR experiments, with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) generally improving as the static magnetic field strength (B) increases, contingent on the design of the NMR probe and receiver.
  • In the low magnetic field limit, SNR improves by a factor of B to the power of 7/4 for small coil geometries, and this holds true for modern magic-angle spinning (MAS) configurations up to a certain size and magnetic field strength.
  • A comprehensive study evaluated SNR under MAS for varying magnetic field strengths from 14.1 to 21.1 T, using different probe designs and standard samples, revealing optimal SNR configurations for different rotor sizes and magnetic fields.

Article Abstract

Sensitivity is the foundation of every NMR experiment, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) should increase with static (B) magnetic field, by a proportionality that primarily depends on the design of the NMR probe and receiver. In the low B field limit, where the coil geometry is much smaller than the wavelength of the NMR frequency, SNR can increase in proportion to B to the power 7/4. For modern magic-angle spinning (MAS) probes, this approximation holds for rotor sizes up to 3.2 mm at 14.1 Tesla (T), corresponding to 600 MHz H and 151 MHz C Larmor frequencies. To obtain the anticipated benefit of larger coils and/or higher B fields requires a quantitative understanding of the contributions to SNR, utilizing standard samples and protocols that reproduce SNR measurements with high accuracy and precision. Here, we present such a systematic and comprehensive study of C SNR under MAS over the range of 14.1 to 21.1 T. We evaluate a range of probe designs utilizing 1.6, 2.5 and 3.2 mm rotors, including 24 different sets of measurements on 17 probe configurations using five spectrometers. We utilize N-acetyl valine as the primary standard and compare and contrast with other commonly used standard samples (adamantane, glycine, hexamethylbenzene, and 3-methylglutaric acid). These robust approaches and standard operating procedures provide an improved understanding of the contributions from probe efficiency, receiver noise figure, and B dependence in a range of custom-designed and commercially available probes. We find that the optimal raw SNR is obtained with balanced 3.2 mm design at 17.6 T, that the best mass-limited SNR is achieved with a balanced 1.6 mm design at 21.1 T, and that the raw SNR at 21.1 T reaches diminishing returns with rotors larger than 2.5 mm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391299PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107709DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

magnetic field
8
snr
8
snr increase
8
understanding contributions
8
standard samples
8
raw snr
8
solid-state nmr
4
nmr sensitivity
4
sensitivity high
4
high magnetic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!