AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of end-ischemic dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (dHOPE) compared to static cold storage (SCS) for preserving livers from brain-dead donors.
  • A total of 104 liver transplant recipients were analyzed, focusing on biliary complications and graft survival over two years, with dHOPE showing promising results primarily in high-risk grafts.
  • The findings indicate that while dHOPE did not significantly improve outcomes in low-risk cases, it led to 100% graft survival in high-risk patients compared to 73.1% with SCS.

Article Abstract

Background: Data on routine hypothermic machine perfusion of livers procured from donors after brain death (DBD) are scarce, and the benefits of the method have only been demonstrated in extended criteria grafts. This study aimed to assess if end-ischemic dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (dHOPE) is superior to static cold storage (SCS) in preservation of livers procured from DBD donors with respect to long-term outcomes. Existing data on short-term outcomes favours dHOPE in patients receiving high-risk grafts.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 104 recipients of DBD livers randomly assigned to SCS arm (78 patients) and the dHOPE arm (26 patients). Endpoints of interest were the occurrence of biliary complications (biliary fistula, anastomotic, and nonanastomotic strictures) and overall patient and graft survival (GS) during the 2-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 36 patients developed biliary complications (at least one event) - six events in dHOPE arm and 30 in SCS arm. There was no significant difference in biliary complications between groups (23.7 vs. 43.4%, P =0.11). No differences were found significant with respect to anastomotic (19.9 vs. 33.7%, P =0.20) and nonanastomotic strictures (0 vs. 11.1%, P =0.10) as well as biliary fistulas (11.7 vs. 12.2%, P =0.93). Survival analysis did not show significantly different results in the study population - overall survival: 92.3% in dHOPE and 83.9% in SCS ( P =0.35), and GS: 92.3 and 81.4% ( P =0.23), respectively. However, a significant difference in GS was noted in recipients of high-risk grafts - 100% in dHOPE and 73.1% in SCS, respectively ( P =0.038).

Conclusions: The long-term outcome data suggest that the routine use of dHOPE may be beneficial for recipients of high-risk grafts from DBD donors. The present study does not provide any evidence for the benefits of dHOPE in low-risk grafts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573112PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001919DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine perfusion
12
biliary complications
12
hypothermic machine
8
donors brain
8
brain death
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
data routine
8
livers procured
8
dhope
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!