Background: Rifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients treated for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.

Results: A total of 829 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (9%) were intolerant to RIF. Patients with RIF intolerance were significantly older (median age: 67 years, IQR 50-78 vs. 48 years, IQR 31-70; < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (57% vs. 41%; = 0.01) and have concurrent diabetes mellitus (37.3% vs. 19%; < 0.0001) compared to those who tolerated RIF. RIF intolerance was most commonly due to transaminitis (25%), cytopenia (14.5%), rash (17.1%) and gastro-intestinal intolerance (7.8%). Twenty patients were subsequently challenged with rifabutin, and this was successful in 70%. The mean treatment duration was significantly longer in patients who were intolerant to RIF (335 vs. 270 days; < 0.001). There was no significant difference in treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: RIF intolerance is more common in older patients, females, and those with concurrent diabetes mellitus. Patients who could not tolerate RIF had a longer duration of therapy, but no difference in treatment outcomes. When attempted, rifabutin was well tolerated in most patients with a previous RIF-related adverse event.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231820PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0466DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rif intolerance
12
patients
10
rif
9
treatment outcomes
8
patients intolerant
8
intolerant rif
8
years iqr
8
concurrent diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
difference treatment
8

Similar Publications

Background: Rifampicin (RIF) is considered the backbone of TB treatment, but adverse effects often limit its use.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients treated for TB disease at our institution, and compared those who received RIF to those who were intolerant to RIF.

Results: A total of 829 patients were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Tuberculosis (TB) is increasing among people with diabetes mellitus (DM), especially in lower-resource countries.
  • A trial in Mexico City tested TB preventive treatments using isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) in individuals with type 2 DM, involving 130 participants.
  • The study was halted due to safety concerns; while the overall adverse event rates were similar, more participants on INH faced serious liver issues, while those on RIF had severe gastrointestinal problems, suggesting that neither treatment is safe enough for routine use in this population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oxazolidinones Can Replace Clarithromycin in Combination with Rifampin in a Mouse Model of Buruli Ulcer.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

March 2019

Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Rifampin (RIF) plus clarithromycin (CLR) for 8 weeks is now the standard of care for Buruli ulcer (BU) treatment, but CLR may not be an ideal companion for rifamycins due to bidirectional drug-drug interactions. The oxazolidinone linezolid (LZD) was previously shown to be active against infection in mice but has dose- and duration-dependent toxicity in humans. Sutezolid (SZD) and tedizolid (TZD) may be safer than LZD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Isoniazid (I) is the drug of choice for treating latent tuberculous infection (LTI). Duration of treatment with I and its liver toxicity represent a serious drawback for a correct enforceability. In several clinical guides, a 3-month course with rifampicin (Rif) and I is recommended as an acceptable alternative to the 6-9 month course with I.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers increase the risk of tuberculosis infection. National recommendations in France for prevention of latent tuberculosis recommend treatment by rifampicin (RIF) 600 mg/day and isoniazid (INH) 300 mg/day for 3 months. However, its toxicity is unknown in this context and is a subject of debate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!