Impacts of Tumor Stage at Diagnosis and Adjuvant Therapy on Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Achieving Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Clin Breast Cancer

The First Department of Breast Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China. Electronic address:

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the impact of tumor stage at diagnosis and adjuvant treatments on long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
  • Patients in clinical stages II-III were analyzed from two cohorts, revealing that those with stage III had significantly worse overall and breast cancer-specific survival outcomes compared to stage II patients.
  • The findings indicate that tumor stage is a strong indicator of long-term survival, while additional adjuvant therapies like chemotherapy and radiation do not significantly improve prognosis for these patients.

Article Abstract

Background: It remains unknown whether the tumor stage at initial diagnosis and adjuvant treatments had any impacts on the long-term survival outcomes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods: Clinical stage II-III patients with TNBC who achieved pCR after NACT were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (SEER cohort) and the National Clinical Research Center for Cancer (Tianjin) in China (TMUCIH cohort). Survival analyses were conducted based on tumor stages and the types of adjuvant treatment received by the patients. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

Results: The TMUCIH cohort comprised 178 patients with a median follow-up of 55.5 months. Two and 3 patients experienced BCSS and OS events, respectively. The SEER cohort included 1218 patients with a median follow-up of 65.5 months, where 53 and 78 patients experienced BCSS and OS events, respectively. Patients diagnosed with stage III disease had significantly higher hazards of death compared to stage II disease (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 3.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-6.07; P < .001; BCSS: HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.38-5.92; P < .001). Adjuvant systemic and radiation therapy did not confer additional benefits to OS and BCSS.

Conclusion: Tumor stage at initial diagnosis remains an independent predictor of long-term survival outcomes in patients with TNBC achieving pCR after NACT. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy do not appear to provide additional benefit to their long-term prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumor stage
12
long-term survival
12
survival outcomes
12
outcomes patients
12
patients
10
diagnosis adjuvant
8
patients triple-negative
8
triple-negative breast
8
breast cancer
8
achieving pathologic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!