A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of cutoff radius and tip atomic structure on energy barriers encountered during AFM tip sliding on 2D monolayers. | LitMetric

In computational studies using the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential, the widely adopted 2.5cutoff radius effectively truncates pairwise interactions across diverse systems (Santra2008234704, Chen and Gao 2021502-12, Bolintineanu2014321-56, Takahiro and Kazuhiro 2010012123, Zhou2016718-26, Toxvaerd and Dyre 2011081102, Toxvaerd and Dyre 2011081102). Here, we assess its adequacy in determining energy barriers encountered by a Si monoatomic tip sliding on various two-dimensional (2D) monolayers, which is crucial for understanding nanoscale friction. Our findings emphasize the necessity of a cutoff radius of at least 3.5to achieve energy barrier values exceeding 95% accuracy across all studied 2D monolayers. Specifically, 3.5corresponds to 12.70 Å in graphene, 12.99 Å in MoSand 13.25 Å in MoSe. The barrier values calculated using this cutoff support previous experiments comparing friction between different orientations of graphene and between graphene and MoS(Almeida201631569, Zhang2014663-7). Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of the 3.5cutoff for graphene on an Au substrate and bilayer graphene. Additionally, we investigate how the atomic configuration of the tip influences the energy barrier, finding a nearly threefold increase in the barrier along the zigzag direction of graphene when using a Si(001) tip composed of seven Si atoms compared to a monoatomic Si tip.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad6164DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cutoff radius
8
energy barriers
8
barriers encountered
8
toxvaerd dyre
8
dyre 2011081102
8
energy barrier
8
barrier values
8
graphene
6
influence cutoff
4
radius atomic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!