Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In computational studies using the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential, the widely adopted 2.5cutoff radius effectively truncates pairwise interactions across diverse systems (Santra2008234704, Chen and Gao 2021502-12, Bolintineanu2014321-56, Takahiro and Kazuhiro 2010012123, Zhou2016718-26, Toxvaerd and Dyre 2011081102, Toxvaerd and Dyre 2011081102). Here, we assess its adequacy in determining energy barriers encountered by a Si monoatomic tip sliding on various two-dimensional (2D) monolayers, which is crucial for understanding nanoscale friction. Our findings emphasize the necessity of a cutoff radius of at least 3.5to achieve energy barrier values exceeding 95% accuracy across all studied 2D monolayers. Specifically, 3.5corresponds to 12.70 Å in graphene, 12.99 Å in MoSand 13.25 Å in MoSe. The barrier values calculated using this cutoff support previous experiments comparing friction between different orientations of graphene and between graphene and MoS(Almeida201631569, Zhang2014663-7). Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of the 3.5cutoff for graphene on an Au substrate and bilayer graphene. Additionally, we investigate how the atomic configuration of the tip influences the energy barrier, finding a nearly threefold increase in the barrier along the zigzag direction of graphene when using a Si(001) tip composed of seven Si atoms compared to a monoatomic Si tip.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad6164 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!