A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Improving Malnutrition Screening among Hemodialysis Patients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Individuals on hemodialysis are at a higher risk for malnutrition, but using subjective global assessment (SGA) for diagnosis is time-consuming.
  • This study compared the effectiveness of the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) and the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) in identifying malnutrition risk among 95 hemodialysis patients through a review of medical charts.
  • Results showed that both screening tools had low sensitivity (20% for CNST and 35% for GNRI), indicating they are not effective at accurately detecting malnutrition risk in this population, leading to the conclusion that further research is needed for better tools.

Article Abstract

Individuals receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk of malnutrition; however, regular diagnosis of malnutrition using subjective global assessment (SGA) is time-consuming. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) or the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) screening tools could accurately identify hemodialysis patients at risk for malnutrition. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for in-centre day shift hemodialysis patients (n = 95) to obtain the results of the SGA assessment and the CNST screener and to calculate the GNRI score. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed only a fair agreement between the SGA and CNST (sensitivity = 20%; specificity 96%; κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435),  < .05) and between the SGA and GNRI (sensitivity = 35%; specificity = 88%; κ = .248 (95% CI, .017 to .479),  < .05). There was no significant statistical difference between the accuracy of either tool in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition ( = .50). The CNST and GNRI do not accurately screen for risk of malnutrition in the hemodialysis population; therefore, further studies are needed to determine an effective malnutrition screening tool in this population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hemodialysis patients
12
risk malnutrition
8
improving malnutrition
4
malnutrition screening
4
hemodialysis
4
screening hemodialysis
4
patients individuals
4
individuals receiving
4
receiving hemodialysis
4
hemodialysis increased
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!