Magnetic resonance imaging of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison between constructive interference steady-state and small field-of-view technique turbo spin echo sequences.

Background: The aim of this work was to optimize a three-dimensional (3D) turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence using a small field-of-view (FOV) technique for the study of the cerebellopontine angle and to compare it with a constructive interference steady-state (CISS) sequence.

Methods: A total of 30 consecutive patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging with a 3Tesla (T) scanner, including 3D CISS and the optimized 3D small FOV technique turbo spin echo (3D SFT-TSE) T2-weighted sequences for the study of the cerebellopontine angle. The 3D SFT-TSE sequence was optimized after three different steps, and a quantitative evaluation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was obtained according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) method. Three neuroradiologists made a blind comparative qualitative evaluation of the images between the 3D CISS and the 3D SFT-TSE obtained after the third optimization step, based on spatial resolution, contrast resolution, and presence of artifacts and noise.

Results: The calculation of SNR using the NEMA method confirmed the superiority of the third optimization step over the others. For both spatial and contrast resolution, the optimized SFT-TSE was considered better (p < 0.001) than the CISS, while image artifacts and noise were considered worse in the CISS sequence (p < 0.001). Intraobserver analysis showed that all neuroradiologists preferred the 3D SFT-TSE sequence in terms of both spatial resolution and contrast resolution and found more noise and artifact disruption in the CISS sequence.

Conclusions: The use of the 2D radiofrequency pulse technique with a 3D SFT-TSE T2 sequence was significantly more efficient than the 3D CISS sequence for the study of the cerebellopontine angle and inner ear structures.