A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Otolithic-acoustic interaction in the control of eye movement. | LitMetric

In order to examine otolithic contribution to eye movements ten subjects were asked to track either a moving acoustic target or a stationary target during subject linear motion on a cart. The relative displacement between the subject and the target was the same in the two situations. Recordings of eye movements during subject lateral acceleration in the dark without any task, or with the task of tracking an imagined stationary target were made as a control. The frequencies ranged between 0.15 and 0.3 Hz and peak acceleration between 0.55 and 1.2 m/s2. No lateral eye movements (L-nystagmus) were recorded in the dark. Only saccadic eye movements were recorded during the tracking of a moving acoustic target. Slow eye movements interspersed by saccades were observed when the moving subject tracked an imagined or an acoustic stationary target. Contribution of the slow phase to tracking was more important in the presence of an acoustic target than in the presence of imagined target. The results are interpreted in terms of an otolithic contribution to the central reconstruction of the acoustic target velocity, or in terms of an adaptive control of the otolithic-ocular reflex gain. A conceptual model accounting for these interpretations is proposed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00238519DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eye movements
20
acoustic target
16
stationary target
12
target
9
otolithic contribution
8
moving acoustic
8
eye
6
movements
5
acoustic
5
otolithic-acoustic interaction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!