AI Article Synopsis

  • Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) is a newer option for young, active patients needing hip replacements, and the study focused on determining key thresholds called Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for outcomes after the procedure.* -
  • Researchers analyzed data from patients before and one year after BHR surgery using various methods to find these thresholds; they found that MCID for pain and physical function was around 9.2 and 9.3, while the PASS thresholds were 77.7 and 87.3 respectively.* -
  • Key factors affecting whether patients reached these thresholds included their mental health status and baseline pain scores, indicating that pre-surgery conditions

Article Abstract

Introduction: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) has emerged as a compelling and innovative alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially among young, active patients. However, the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds have not yet been determined for patients undergoing BHR. Therefore, the current study aimed to (1) determine the MCID and PASS thresholds for both the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-Pain and HOOS physical function shortform (PS), for patients who underwent BHR; and (2) identify factors influencing the achievement of MCID and PASS for HOOS-Pain and HOOS-PS.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from patients undergoing BHR was analyzed. Patients with osteoarthritis and completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMs were included. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate MCID and PASS, respectively. The optimal cut-off point for PASS thresholds was calculated using the Youden index.

Results: MCID for HOOS-Pain and PS were calculated to be 9.2 and 9.3, respectively. The PASS threshold for HOOS-Pain and PS were ≥ 77.7 and ≥ 87.3, respectively. The current study identified several factors affecting postoperative achievement of thresholds. Baseline Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were a predictor for achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-Pain, achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-PS, achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-Pain, and achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-PS. Furthermore, baseline HOOS-Pain was a significant predictor for achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-PS, achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-Pain, and achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-PS.

Conclusions: MCID and PASS thresholds were established for HOOS-Pain and PS domains following BHR with most patients achieving these clinically meaningful benchmarks. Additionally, several factors affecting achievement of MCID and PASS were identified, including modifiable risk factors that may allow clinicians to implement optimization strategies and further improve outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417060PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05443-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcid pass
20
pass thresholds
16
achieving pass
16
pass postoperative
16
pass
12
achieving mcid
12
mcid postoperative
12
postoperative hoos-pain
12
hoos-pain achieving
12
postoperative hoos-ps
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!