AI Article Synopsis

  • Language-concordant health care, where patients receive care in their preferred language, is crucial for accessibility and quality, yet linguistic minorities experience greater travel challenges in accessing such care compared to others.* -
  • The study evaluated patient satisfaction with an online map tool designed to help users find family physicians who speak their language in Ottawa and surrounding areas, using an online survey for data collection.* -
  • Out of 93 respondents, 61% expressed satisfaction with the tool; feedback highlighted the need for features like identifying physicians accepting new patients, improved user interface, and updated information, while some also noted difficulties in finding a family physician.*

Article Abstract

Background: Language-concordant health care, or health care in a patient's language of choice, is an important element of health accessibility that improves patient safety and comfort and facilitates an increased quality of care. However, prior research has found that linguistic minorities often face higher travel burdens to access language-concordant care compared to the general population.

Objective: This study intended to assess patient experiences and satisfaction with an online interactive physician map that allows patients to find family physicians who speak their preferred language in and around Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, as a means of identifying areas of improvement.

Methods: This study used an online survey with questions related to user satisfaction. Responses to Likert-scale questions were compiled as summary statistics and short-answer responses underwent thematic analysis. The study setting was Ottawa and Renfrew County, Ontario, and the surrounding region, including the province of Quebec.

Results: A total of 93 respondents completed the survey and self-identified as living in Ontario or Quebec. Overall, 57 (61%) respondents were "very satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" with the map, 16 (17%) were "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied," and 20 (22%) were "very dissatisfied" or "somewhat dissatisfied." We found no significant differences in satisfaction by preferred language, age group, physician attachment, or intended beneficiary. A total of 56 respondents provided short-answer responses to an open-ended question about map improvements. The most common specific suggestion was to show which physicians are accepting new patients (n=20). Other suggestions included data refreshes (n=6), user interface adjustments (n=23), and additional languages (n=2). Some participants also provided positive feedback (n=5) or expressed concern with their inability to find a family physician (n=5). Several comments included multiple suggestions.

Conclusions: While most patients were satisfied with the online map, a significant minority expressed dissatisfaction that the map did not show which family physicians were accepting new patients. This suggests that there may be public interest in an accessible database of which family physicians in Ontario are currently accepting new patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267088PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/56716DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

family physicians
16
accepting patients
12
physicians ontario
8
ontario canada
8
online survey
8
health care
8
find family
8
preferred language
8
short-answer responses
8
total respondents
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!