AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates new diagnostic methods for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), focusing on how spinal cord motion and spinal stenosis impact mechanical strain on the spine.
  • It involved 84 patients who were divided into two groups based on MRI findings, assessing their neurological function alongside spinal motion and stenosis through advanced imaging techniques.
  • Results showed that patients with visible lesions on MRI (MRI+) faced more severe impairment, while spinal cord motion was identified as a key indicator for evaluating non-lesion patients (MRI-), suggesting it could help in making more timely surgical decisions.

Article Abstract

Introduction: New diagnostic techniques are a substantial research focus in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). This cross-sectional study determined the significance of cardiac-related spinal cord motion and the extent of spinal stenosis as indicators of mechanical strain on the cord.

Methods: Eighty-four DCM patients underwent MRI/clinical assessments and were classified as MRI+ [T2-weighted (T2w) hyperintense lesion in MRI] or MRI- (no T2w-hyperintense lesion). Cord motion (displacement assessed by phase-contrast MRI) and spinal stenosis [adapted spinal canal occupation ratio (aSCOR)] were related to neurological (sensory/motor) and neurophysiological readouts [contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs)] by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: MRI+ patients ( = 31; 36.9%) were more impaired compared to MRI- patients ( = 53; 63.1%) based on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) subscores for upper {MRI+ [median (Interquartile range)]: 4 (4-5); MRI-: 5 (5-5);  < 0.01} and lower extremity [MRI+: 6 (6-7); MRI-: 7 (6-7);  = 0.03] motor dysfunction and the monofilament score [MRI+: 21 (18-23); MRI-: 24 (2224);  < 0.01]. Both patient groups showed similar extent of cord motion and stenosis. Only in the MRI- group displacement identified patients with pathologic assessments [trunk/lower extremity pin prick score (T/LEPP): AUC = 0.67,  = 0.03; CHEPs: AUC = 0.73,  = 0.01]. Cord motion thresholds: T/LEPP: 1.67 mm (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 52.5%); CHEPs: 1.96 mm (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 65.6%). The aSCOR failed to show any relation to the clinical assessments.

Discussion: These findings affirm cord motion measurements as a promising additional biomarker to improve the clinical workup and to enable timely surgical treatment particularly in MRI- DCM patients.

Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02170155.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228334PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1411182DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cord motion
12
cardiac-related spinal
8
spinal cord
8
degenerative cervical
8
cervical myelopathy
8
spinal stenosis
8
spinal
5
potential thresholds
4
thresholds critically
4
critically increased
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!