Prediction of Long-Term Poor Clinical Outcomes in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Using Neural Networks Model: The BEAST Study.

Int J Gen Med

Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Royal Holloway University of London (ICR2UL), Egham, Greater London, UK.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Risk prediction models for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) traditionally rely on logistic regression, which faces challenges with skewed datasets.
  • Researchers evaluated 1309 CVT patients using neural networks (NNs) to uncover independent predictors of poor outcomes, finding higher accuracy and better predictive values than logistic regression.
  • Key findings revealed that cerebral hemorrhage and thrombolysis are strong predictors of long-term poor outcomes, while other factors like age had minimal impact, suggesting that neural networks could enhance clinical decision-making compared to traditional methods.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Risk prediction models are commonly performed with logistic regression analysis but are limited by skewed datasets. We utilised neural networks (NNs) model to identify independent predictors of poor outcomes in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) due to the limitations of logistic regression (LR) analysis with complex datasets.

Methods: We evaluated 1309 adult CVT patients from the prospective BEAST (Biorepository to Establish the Aetiology of Sinovenous Thrombosis) study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve confirmed the goodness-of-fit of prediction models. The normalised importance (NI) of the NNs determines the significance of independent predictors.

Results: The stepwise logistic regression model found thrombolysis (OR 32.1; 95% CI 3.6-287.0; =0.002), craniotomy (OR 6.9; 95% CI 1.3-36.8; =0.02), and cerebral haemorrhage (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.3-15.4; =0.01) as predictors of poor clinical outcome with the AUROC of 0.71. Conversely, the NNs model identified major independent predictors of long-term poor clinical outcomes as cerebral haemorrhage (NI 100%) and thrombolysis (NI 98%), as well as trivial predictors of age (NI 2.8%) and altered mental status (NI 3.5%). The accuracy of the NNs model was 95.1% and 94.1% for self-learned randomly selected training and testing samples with an AUROC of 0.82. Positive and negative predictive values for poor outcomes were 13.2% and 97.1% for the LR model, compared with the NNs model of 18.8% and 98.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: Cerebral haemorrhage and thrombolysis was a strong independent predictor, whereas age merely impacts the long-term poor clinical outcome in adult CVT. Integrating unorthodox neural networks risk prediction model can improve decision-making as it outperforms conventional logistic regression with complex datasets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228426PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S468433DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

poor clinical
16
logistic regression
16
nns model
16
long-term poor
12
outcomes cerebral
12
neural networks
12
cerebral haemorrhage
12
clinical outcomes
8
cerebral venous
8
venous thrombosis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!