A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Performance analysis of linearization schemes for modelling multi-phase flow in porous media. | LitMetric

Performance analysis of linearization schemes for modelling multi-phase flow in porous media.

Sci Rep

Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Education City, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, P. O. Box 5825, Doha, Qatar.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • * The study assesses different numerical linearization techniques—finite difference central (FDC), finite forward difference (FDF), and operator-based linearization (OBL)—focusing on their accuracy and computational efficiency.
  • * Results highlight that FDC is highly accurate but slower, OBL is fast but suited for simpler scenarios, and FDF balances precision and speed, guiding the selection of methods for enhancing reservoir simulation performance.

Article Abstract

Reservoir simulation is crucial for understanding the flow response in underground reservoirs, and it significantly helps reduce uncertainties in geological characterization and optimize methodologies for field development strategies. However, providing efficient and accurate solutions for the strong heterogeneity remains challenging, as most of the discretization methods cannot handle this complexity. In this work, we perform a comprehensive assessment of various numerical linearization techniques employed in reservoir simulation, particularly focusing on the performance of the nonlinear solver for problem dealing with fluid flow in porous media. The primary linearization methods examined are finite difference central (FDC), finite forward difference (FDF), and operator-based linearization (OBL). These methods are rigorously analyzed and compared in terms of their accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to changing reservoir conditions. The results demonstrate that each method has distinct strengths and limitations. The FDC method is more accurate particularly in complex simulations where strong heterogeneity are introduced but is generally slower in convergence. The OBL on the other hand, is more efficient and converges quickly, which makes it suitable for scenarios with limited computational resources and simple physics, while the FDF method provides a balanced combination of precision and computational speed, contingent upon careful step size management of the derivative estimations. This paper aims to guide the selection of appropriate linearization techniques for enhancing nonlinear solvers' accuracy and efficiency in reservoir simulation .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228052PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66628-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reservoir simulation
12
flow porous
8
porous media
8
strong heterogeneity
8
linearization techniques
8
linearization
5
performance analysis
4
analysis linearization
4
linearization schemes
4
schemes modelling
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!