Chemsex as lines of flight? Critical Deleuzean perspectives on chemical intimacies.

Background: Public health scholars informed by a dominant biomedical paradigm have in their 'rush to risk' emphasised the problematic aspects of chemsex. Meanwhile, critical chemsex scholars have attemped to destigmatise such sexual-chemical practices and foreground how they can be transformative. Taking these two perspectives as points of departure, we make a case for understanding chemsex vis-à-vis Deleuzean lines of flight.

Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 33 purposively sampled sexual minority men seeking therapy for chemsex dependency in Singapore. Interview topics included participants' experiences and histories of chemsex, substance use, and their ongoing recovery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and then analysed according to key themes.

Results: We illustrate how chemically inflected sexual encounters can offer deterritorialising flights of fantasy and freedom from a heteronormative social structure that pathologises gay sex. At the same time, we argue that these flight lines are not static, neither do they extend indefinitely in space-time. Rather, we show how flights of freedom can evolve into lines of fright (or non-flight) when chemsex practitioners are met with critical thresholds that reveal the less-than-desirable aspects of being intoxicated. Consequently, they may eventually consider the reterritorialisation of their lives (i.e. abstinence and recovery) as a more constructive option. Regardless of their decisions to ride on chemically-induced flight lines or to take a step back from such deterritorialising pathways, they have troubled stereotypical perspectives of drug users as passive automatons.

Conclusions: This paper enriches the chemsex scholarship by presenting a Deleuzean conceptualisation of chemical-sexual intimacies without romantacising and/or overstating the 'escape'/'freedom' that chemsex can facilitate. Future research in this arena could explore the complicated intimate relationships that users may have with their drug(s) of choice, and their varied lines of (non-)flight over a longitudinal study.