Background: The recommendation to perform biopsy of PIRADS 3 lesions has not been adopted with strength as compared to higher scored lesions on multiparametric MRI. This represents a challenging scenario and an unmet need for clinicians to apply a risk adapted approach in these cases. In the present study, we examined clinical and radiologic characteristics in men with PI-RADS 3 index lesions that can predict csPCa on mpMRI-target biopsy.

Methods: Revision of a prospective database with patients who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies from 2015 to 2023 for PI-RADS 3 lesions identified on mpMRI. Baseline variables were collected, such as PSA density (PSAd), 4Kscore, prostate size, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the lesion on mpMRI. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analyses (DCA) assessing the association between clinic-radiologic factors and csPCa were performed.

Results: Overall, 230 patients were included in the study and the median age was 65 years. The median prostate size and PSA were 50 g and 6.26 ng/mL, respectively. 17.4% of patients had csPCa, while 27.5% had Gleason group 1. In univariable logistic analyses, we found that age, BMI, prostate size, PSAd, ADC, and 4Kscore were significant csPCa predictors (P < 0.05). PSAd showed the best prediction performance in terms of AUC (= 0.679). On multivariable analysis, PSAd and 4Kscore were associated with csPCa. The net benefit of PSAd combined with clinical features was superior to those of other parameters. Within patients with PSAd < 0.15, 4Kscore was a statistically significant predictor of csPCa (OR = 3.25, P = 0.032).

Conclusion: PSAd and 4Kscore are better predictors of csPCa in patients with PIRADS 3 lesions compared to ADC. The predictive role of 4Kscore is higher in patients with low PSAd. These results can assist practitioners in the risk stratification of patients with equivocal lesions to determine the need of biopsy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377163PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pi-rads lesions
12
psad 4kscore
12
prostate size
12
pirads lesions
8
psad
8
lesions
7
cspca
7
patients
7
4kscore
6
molecular diffusion
4

Similar Publications

MRI-directed Micro-US-guided Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: A 1-year Follow-up Study.

Radiology

December 2024

From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., A.L.) and Urology (M.G.), Clinique de l'Alma, 166 Rue de l'Université, 75007 Paris, France; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.d.B., L.v.R.); and Department of Pathology, i-Path Institut de Pathologie des Hauts-de-France, Amiens, France (P.C.).

Background MRI-guided focal laser ablation (FLA) is a promising treatment in localized prostate cancer (PCa). MRI-guided micro-US FLA shows potential for outpatient use, but its clinical application remains unexplored. Purpose To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and 12-month functional and oncologic outcomes of MRI-guided micro-US transperineal FLA in localized PCa and to assess the accuracy of micro-US in showing lesions depicted at MRI with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3 or higher.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nature of ultrasound characteristics during mpMRI/TRUS cognitive fusion targeted biopsy (cTB).

Methods: From 2023 to 2024, data from 502 lesions in 426 men who underwent targeted combined systematic biopsy were analyzed. All lesions had a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of ≥ 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The introduction of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has revolutionized prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, enhancing the localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and guiding targeted biopsies. However, significant disparities in the execution, interpretation, and reporting of prostate MRI examinations across centers necessitate greater standardization and accuracy. This study compares the diagnostic efficacy of mpMRI from academic and nonacademic centers in detecting csPCa and identifies factors associated with csPCa detection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI.

Urol Oncol

December 2024

Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT; Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT. Electronic address:

Background And Objective: As most Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions on MRI harbor Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 disease on biopsy, optimal management of patients with imaging-biopsy discordance remains unclear. To estimate grade misclassification, we evaluated the incidence of Gleason upgrading among patients with GG1 disease in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion.

Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis to identify patients with GG1 prostate cancer on fusion biopsy with MRI demonstrating ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the current Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) is considered optional, with primary scoring based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!