Serological diagnosis of strongyloidiasis: An evaluation of three commercial assays.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of International Health, Charité Center for Global Health, Berlin, Germany.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Strongyloidiasis is a chronic intestinal infection caused by a nematode that is becoming a concern in non-endemic countries, particularly for travelers and migrants, and its diagnosis is complicated due to a lack of standardized testing methods.
  • Researchers evaluated three commercial ELISA kits for detecting IgG antibodies to Strongyloides stercoralis using serum samples from affected travelers and healthy controls, finding varying sensitivity and specificity among the assays.
  • Results indicated that while the assays had high specificity overall, their sensitivity was low, highlighting the challenges in reliably diagnosing strongyloidiasis, especially in patients with recent or acute infections.

Article Abstract

Background: Strongyloidiasis is caused by a neglected nematode, manifesting as chronic intestinal infection with potentially severe manifestations. The disease is an emerging problem in non-endemic countries affecting travelers and migrants. Diagnosis of strongyloidiasis is hampered by the lack of standardization and absence of a gold standard. Since adequate direct methods to detect the motile larvae in stool samples are not widely available, other techniques such as serology have been developed.

Methods: We evaluated three commercial ELISA kits (DRG Instruments, IVD Research, and Bordier Affinity Products) to detect IgG antibodies against Strongyloides stercoralis assays utilizing serum samples from travelers with microscopically confirmed strongyloidiasis (n = 50) and other imported helminthic infections (n = 159) as well as healthy controls (n = 50).

Results: The DRG, IVD, and Bordier assays showed sensitivities of 58.0%, 64.0%, and 56.0%, respectively. Specificity values were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 92.0% in healthy controls, and 67.3%, 62.9%, and 76.7% in cases with other helminth infections, respectively. Cross-reactions were mostly observed in cases with other nematodes (37.5%, 42.5%, and 20.0%, respectively), but also in trematode (33.3%, 38.1%, and 19.0%, respectively) and in cestode infections (25.0%, 30.0%, and 32.5%, respectively).

Conclusion: The study demonstrates the diagnostic limitations of serological assays to detect or exclude cases of strongyloidiasis in returning travelers, who frequently present with recent or acute infections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253981PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012319DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnosis strongyloidiasis
8
three commercial
8
ivd bordier
8
healthy controls
8
strongyloidiasis
5
serological diagnosis
4
strongyloidiasis evaluation
4
evaluation three
4
assays
4
commercial assays
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!