AI Article Synopsis

  • - The text discusses the importance of reaching a consensus on the medical diagnoses for fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO), highlighting the need for standardized recommendations for better clinical practice and research.
  • - A modified Delphi process involving 26 international experts led to consensus on five key themes, including evaluating epidemiologic factors, updating classification criteria, and initial evaluation methods for FUO/IUO diagnoses.
  • - The recommendations suggest improvements over previous definitions, such as being cautious with empiric therapies and explicitly disagreeing on certain diagnostic methods, which could benefit clinicians and researchers dealing with these complex syndromes.

Article Abstract

Background: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are syndromes commonly used as medical diagnoses. Since the existing literature has a mixture of diagnostic approaches, developing consensus-based recommendations would be helpful for clinicians, researchers, and patients.

Methods: A modified Delphi process was performed from October 2022 to July 2023, involving 4 rounds of online surveys and 2 live video conferences. The panel comprised international experts recruited based on peer-reviewed published publications and studies.

Results: Among 50 invited experts, 26 (52.0%) agreed to participate. Twenty-three panelists completed round 1 of the survey, 21 completed rounds 2 and 3, 20 completed round 4, and 7 participated in round 5 live video discussions. Of the participants, 18 (78.3%) were academic-based clinicians and researchers, 5 (21.7%) practiced in a community-based hospital, and 6 (26.1%) were female. Consensus was reached on 5 themes: (1) incorporating epidemiologic factors, such as geographic location and travel history; (2) updated criteria for classifying FUO or IUO; (3) initial evaluation approaches; (4) a classification system for diagnoses; and (5) recommendations for judicious limitation of empiric therapies. Experts strongly disagreed with using 2-deoxy-2-[F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography as part of the diagnostic criteria for FUO. There were mixed opinions about the importance of the temperature measurement site, the 3-week minimum illness criterion, the need for a standard definition of relapsing fevers, and the use of similar evaluation strategies for FUO and IUO.

Conclusions: These Delphi-generated consensus-based recommendations offer potential improvements compared with earlier definitions and a guide for clinical practice and future research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222709PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae298DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unknown origin
12
inflammation unknown
8
modified delphi
8
consensus-based recommendations
8
clinicians researchers
8
live video
8
completed round
8
recommendations
4
recommendations updating
4
updating fever
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!