Why do RhD negative pregnant women still become anti-D immunized despite prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin?

Transfus Apher Sci

Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address:

Published: August 2024

Maternal allo-anti-D in RhD negative pregnant women may cause mild to severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Although several other antibodies may also destroy red blood cells of the fetus and newborn, preventive measures with anti-D immunoglobulin are only available for D antigen. Targeted antenatal care together with postpartum prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin has significantly reduced the D-alloimmunization risk. Potentially sensitizing events like trauma to the pregnant abdomen, vaginal bleeding, and amniocentesis may lead to fetomaternal hemorrhage and necessitate additional doses. Despite comprehensive programs with these targeted measures, allo-anti-D is still the most common reason for severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Where do we fail then? Here, in this review, I would therefore like to discuss the reasons for D-alloimmunizations hoping that the greater focus will pave the way for further reduction in the number of pregnancy-related allo-anti-Ds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2024.103969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fetus newborn
12
rhd negative
8
negative pregnant
8
pregnant women
8
prophylaxis anti-d
8
severe hemolytic
8
hemolytic disease
8
disease fetus
8
anti-d immunoglobulin
8
anti-d
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!