AI Article Synopsis

  • The field of medical grade footwear is transitioning from individual expertise to a more evidence-based approach, but currently lacks sufficient scientific data, making a research agenda essential for growth.
  • A multidisciplinary team followed a structured seven-step methodology to develop this research agenda, gathering insights from various stakeholders including pedorthists, rehabilitation physicians, and users.
  • The process involved surveying 109 participants, generating 228 potential research questions, narrowing them down to 65 prioritized questions, and ultimately creating a final research agenda with 26 questions ready for implementation through collaborative research projects.

Article Abstract

Background: The field of medical grade footwear is dynamic. Originally, a field where individual knowledge, expertise and skills determined the footwear and its outcomes, now becoming a more evidence-based and data-driven field with protocols and systems in place to create appropriate footwear. However, scientific evidence concerning medical grade footwear is still limited. Evidently, all stakeholders, from patients to pedorthists to rehabilitation physicians, will profit from a larger evidence-base in this field. A widely supported research agenda is an essential first step to advance and facilitate new knowledge.

Methods: We formed a multidisciplinary team and followed the methodology from Dutch medical societies for the development of a research agenda on medical grade footwear. This consisted of seven steps: (1) inventory of relevant questions with users and professionals; (2) analyses of responses; (3) analyses of existing knowledge and evidence; (4) formulating research questions; (5) prioritising research questions by users and professionals; (6) finalising the research agenda and (7) implementing the research agenda.

Results: In phase 1, 109 participants completed a survey, including 50% pedorthists, 6% rehabilitation physicians and 3% users. Participants provided 228 potential research questions. In phases 2-4, these were condensed to 65 research questions. In phase 5, 152 participants prioritised these 65 research questions, including 50% pedorthists, 13% rehabilitation physicians and 9% users. In phase 6, the final research agenda was created, with 26 research questions, categorised based on the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health 'process description assistive devices'. In phase 7, an implementation meeting was held with over 50 stakeholders (including users and professionals), resulting in seven applications for research projects based on one or more research questions from the research agenda.

Conclusions: This research agenda structures and guides knowledge development within the field of medical grade footwear in the Netherlands and elsewhere. We expect that this will help to stimulate the field to tackle the research questions prioritised and with that to advance scientific knowledge in this field.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633342PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical grade
20
grade footwear
20
rehabilitation physicians
12
users professionals
12
questions
10
development agenda
8
agenda medical
8
footwear netherlands
8
advance scientific
8
scientific knowledge
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!