Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) information has been routinely collected in Cancer Care Alberta (CCA) for years using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) and Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC). There was interest in combining these into a more comprehensive single measure tailored to ambulatory cancer settings. The purpose of this study was to validate an expanded and redesigned ESAS-r called the ESAS-r Cancer.

Methods: Stakeholder engagement, a review of the literature, and 2 years of CPC data collected in the cancer program informed the addition of six symptoms to the ESAS-r. To assess and validate the measure, 1,600 randomly sampled patients were mailed paper copies of the ESAS-r Cancer, ESAS-r, and a validated, comprehensive PRO measure called the Memorial System Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), which is often used with patients with cancer. Canonical Correlation Analysis and exploratory factor analyses were performed to assess concurrent and construct validity of the ESAS-r Cancer against ESAS-r, using MSAS-SF as the reference measure for comparison. Cronbach α was calculated to assess reliability.

Results: Four hundred and sixty-one patients (29% response rate) completed all three questionnaires. ESAS-r Cancer showed higher numerical correlation than ESAS-r and accounted for more information included on MSAS-SF, explaining slightly more variance than ESAS-r (75.2% 73.5%). The three-dimensional factor structure of ESAS-r Cancer outperformed the two-dimensional factor structure of ESAS-r. The reliability of ESAS-r Cancer was verified and found to be slightly higher than ESAS-r (Cronbach α = .903 .884).

Conclusion: ESAS-r Cancer is now in use with patients throughout CCA. This valid and reliable PRO measure can be used by other cancer or specialized health care programs who wish to routinely assess common symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649173PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00088DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esas-r cancer
24
esas-r
16
cancer
13
patient-reported outcomes
8
ambulatory cancer
8
cancer settings
8
revised edmonton
8
edmonton symptom
8
symptom assessment
8
assessment system
8

Similar Publications

Symptom severity reported by older adults with cancer and its impact on survival prognostication.

J Geriatr Oncol

November 2024

Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.; Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore.

Introduction: Symptom burden is a crucial factor for survival prognostication, but older adults may report fewer and less severe symptoms than younger patients. We investigated the impact of age on symptom severity and its prognostic implications in the prognostic model for advanced cancer (PRO-MAC).

Materials And Methods: Eight hundred forty subjects with incurable cancer, who were reviewed by palliative medicine at a tertiary university hospital, were categorized into four groups based on age: < 65 (young), 65-74 (young-old), 75-84 (old-old), and ≥ 85 (oldest-old) for comparison.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer-associated malnutrition is associated with worse symptom severity, functional status, quality of life, and overall survival. Malnutrition in cancer patients is often under-recognized and undertreated, emphasizing the need for standardized pathways for nutritional management in this population. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the relationship between malnutrition risk and self-reported symptom severity scores in an adult oncology outpatient population and (2) to identify whether a secondary screening tool for malnutrition risk (abPG-SGA) should be recommended for patients with a specific ESAS-r cut-off score or group of ESAS-r cut-off scores.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) information has been routinely collected in Cancer Care Alberta (CCA) for years using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) and Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC). There was interest in combining these into a more comprehensive single measure tailored to ambulatory cancer settings. The purpose of this study was to validate an expanded and redesigned ESAS-r called the ESAS-r Cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer is the primary underlying condition for most Canadians who are provided Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). However, it is unknown whether cancer patients who are provided MAID experience disproportionally higher symptom burden compared to those who are not provided MAID. Thus, we used a propensity-score-matched cohort design to evaluate longitudinal symptom trajectories over the last 12 months of patients' lives, comparing cancer patients in Alberta who were and were not provided MAID.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Music therapy (MT) offers benefits of improved symptom relief and quality of life at the end of life, but its impact on hospice patients and caregivers needs more research. To assess the impact of MT intervention on symptom burden and well-being of hospice patients and caregivers. A total of 18 hospice patients, selected based on scores ≥4 on the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) items on pain, depression, anxiety, or well-being, participated in MT sessions provided by a board-certified music therapist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!