Optimization of Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK Outcomes: A Prospective Comparative Study of ZZ InnovEyes Strategy versus Automated Strategy.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of Zhang and Zheng's InnovEyes (ZZ InnovEyes) strategy for optimizing outcomes of ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) compared to the standard automated strategy.

Methods: A total of 38 patients (71 eyes) undergoing therapeutic refractive surgery at Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital were randomly assigned to the ZZ InnovEyes and automated groups using double-masked randomization. The study assessed visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and higher-order aberrations preoperatively and at 1-day, 2-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Statistical analysis was done with Microsoft Excel and SPSS 19.0.

Results: The exposure and control groups comprised 36 and 35 eyes, respectively. The ZZ InnovEyes group demonstrated significant advantages in manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) correction compared to the automated approach group (0.13 ± 0.30 D vs 0.62 ± 0.40 D, p < 0.001), achieving 97.22% uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/16 or better compared to 85.71% in the automated group at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.08), and achieving 50.00% UDVA of 20/12.5 or better compared to 28.57% in the automated group at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.06). Loss lines from preoperative corrected distance visual acuity to postoperative UDVA were lower in the ZZ InnovEyes group (0.00%) than the automated group (8.57%; p = 0.07). Both groups exhibited similar astigmatism corrections and higher-order aberrations.

Conclusion: The ZZ InnovEyes strategy, which incorporates manifest and wavefront refraction for ray-tracing-guided LASIK, demonstrated superior MRSE correction and potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to the standard automated strategy. This study highlights the need for ongoing optimization and research in refractive surgery.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300078709.