A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Hyaluronate-Based Ophthalmical Viscosurgical Devices FIDIAL PLUS and IAL-F in Cataract Surgery. | LitMetric

To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure. Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study: 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL-F (ratio 1:1). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired -test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery. FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported. This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cataract surgery
12
sodium hyaluronate-based
8
fidial
8
bacteria-derived fidial
8
animal-derived ial-f
8
noninferior efficacy
8
fidial compared
8
percent loss
8
corneal endothelial
8
surgery fidial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!