Background: Early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common reason for revision. The purpose of this study was to determine if the acuity of the dislocation episode affects the risk of revision surgery.
Methods: A retrospective review of a national, all-payer administrative database comprised of claims from 2010 to 2020 was used to identify patients who had a prosthetic hip dislocation at various postoperative time intervals (0 to 7, 7 to 30, 30 to 60, and 60 to 90 days). Of the 45,352 primary unilateral THA patients who had sufficient follow-up, there were 2,878 dislocations within 90 days. Dislocators were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and a comorbidity index with a control group (no dislocation). Demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, ten-year revision rates, and complications were compared among cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for revision THA following early dislocation.
Results: Among matched cohorts, dislocation at any time interval was associated with significantly increased odds of subsequent 10-years revision (OR [odds ratio] = 25.60 to 33.4, P < .001). Acute dislocators within 7 days did not have an increased risk of all cause revisions at 10 years relative to other early dislocators. Revision for indication of instability decreased with time to first dislocation (<7 days: 85.7% versus 60 to 90 days: 53.9%). Primary diagnoses of posttraumatic arthritis (OR = 2.53 [1.84 to 3.49], P < .001), hip fracture (OR = 3.8 [2.53 to 5.72], P < .001), and osteonecrosis (OR = 1.75 [1.12 to 2.73], P = .010) were most commonly associated with revision surgery after an early dislocation.
Conclusions: Dislocation within 90 days of THA is associated with increased odds of subsequent revision. Early dislocation within 7 days of surgery has similar all cause revision-free survivorship, but an increased risk of a subsequent revision for instability when compared to patients who dislocated within 7 to 90 days.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.013 | DOI Listing |
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)
November 2024
Departamento de Ortopedia, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, Índia.
A 69-year-old female patient, who had been operated on 20 years ago (unipolar hip prosthesis), presented with a complaint of pain in the thigh and a limp with onset 1 year before. An X ray revealed stem subsidence and varus collapse. One-stage revision hip replacement was performed in view of poor cardiac status, and grew in the tissue culture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Biomech (Bristol)
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for advanced hip osteoarthritis, yet complications like hip dislocation (0.2 %-10 %) persist due to factors such as implant design, positioning, surgical technique, and patient-specific conditions. Impingement between prosthetic components or the acetabulum and proximal femur is a primary cause of instability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Case Rep
December 2024
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
October 2024
Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Background: Pelvic reconstruction after type I + II (or type I + II + III) internal hemipelvectomy with extensive ilium removal is a great challenge. In an attempt to anatomically reconstruct the hip rotation center (HRC) and achieve a low mechanical failure rate, a custom-made, 3D-printed prosthesis with a porous articular interface was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this prosthesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Orthop Trauma Surg
December 2024
Virtua Health, Marlton, NJ, USA.
Objective: The primary research aim was to determine if the use of traditional or 3D printed prosthesis resulted in better functional outcome scores in hip arthroplasty.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, WebOfScience, and Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched yielding 1117 article titles and abstracts.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!