Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Aim: To compare two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis techniques for measuring tertiary dentin (TD) volume, density, and root length increase, after indirect pulp therapy (IPT) in young permanent teeth with conventional periapical radiographs.
Design: Comparative study design: Sixty-nine CBCT scans were taken initially (T1) and after 1 year (T2) of IPT. New CBCT analysis technique A, standardization, segmentation, and registration of T1 and T2 scans were performed using ITK-SNAP and 3D Slicer CMF to measure TD volume (mm), density (gray-level intensity), and root length increase (mm). In the traditional CBCT analysis technique B, analyses were conducted using the In-Vivo software to calculate TD thickness (mm), radiodensity (HU%), and root length increase (mm). Paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to compare and assess the reliability of all techniques.
Results: No significant difference between the two techniques existed in the measurement of TD mineral density (Mean [SD]:A = 22.4 [15.4]; B = 24.4 [15.4]; p = .47). Technique A resulted in significantly higher root length increase values (Mean [SD]: A = 1.3 [0.6]; B = 1.1 [0.5]; p = .03). The two techniques showed acceptable reliability levels (0.76-0.99).
Conclusion: CBCT analysis techniques yielded similar findings for mineral density. The new CBCT volumetric analysis technique, although more laborious, produced higher values for root length increase, and allowed for measurement of dentin volume.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13232 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!