AI Article Synopsis

  • This review investigates the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on central post-stroke pain (CPSP), which is a challenging condition to treat.
  • The analysis included six randomized controlled trials with 288 patients, showing that rTMS significantly reduced pain compared to a placebo, although it wasn’t notably more effective than conventional treatments for long-term pain management.
  • While rTMS can help alleviate pain and enhance motor function in CPSP patients, it does not show significant improvements in anxiety, depression, or specific motor response latencies.

Article Abstract

Background: The rehabilitation of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a complex clinical challenge, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely applied in the research of neurofunctional recovery following stroke. However, there is currently no reliable evidence-based medicine supporting the efficacy of rTMS in central post-stroke pain. This review aims to evaluate the effects of rTMS on central post-stroke pain.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted searches on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wan Fang Data Knowledge Service Platform. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of rTMS in treating central post-stroke pain, and conducted screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Characteristics of the included RCTs were extracted. The heterogeneity of the trials was assessed using the I2 statistic. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17 software. Bias risk and methodological quality were evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the Pedro scale.

Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials involving 288 patients met our inclusion criteria. In our analysis, rTMS was more effective in treating patients with CPSP compared to the placebo group (SMD=-1.15, 95% CI: -1.69, -0.61, < 0.001). Furthermore, results from subgroup analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the improvement of pain for durations exceeding 6 months when comparing rTMS to conventional treatment (SMD=-0.80, 95% CI: -1.63, 0.03, = 0.059).

Conclusion: TMS can alleviate pain in CPSP patients and improve their motor function, but its effects on depression, anxiety, and MEP-latency are not significant.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42024497530.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199869PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1367649DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

central post-stroke
20
post-stroke pain
16
randomized controlled
12
controlled trials
12
repetitive transcranial
8
transcranial magnetic
8
magnetic stimulation
8
pain cpsp
8
rtms central
8
pain
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!