AI Article Synopsis

  • Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) improves bladder cancer detection during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), but its everyday implementation is not fully assessed.
  • An analysis of Germany's patient data from 2010 to 2021 revealed that PDD use increased two-fold, with PDD patients being younger and discharged earlier yet incurring about €500 more in costs.
  • PDD was associated with lower rates of transfusions, ICU admissions, and 30-day mortality compared to traditional white-light TURBT, though it also had slightly higher rates of bladder perforation and reoperations, indicating more research is needed before it becomes standard practice.

Article Abstract

Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is guideline recommended, as it improves bladder cancer detection rates. However, the extent to which PDD is implemented in everyday clinical practice has not been thoroughly assessed. We aimed to evaluate the current trends and major perioperative outcomes of TURBT with PDD. The present study evaluated the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND) from 2010 (the year when PDD started to be coded separately in Germany) to 2021, which were made available from the Research Data Center of the German Bureau of Statistics. We undertook numerous patient-level and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Overall, 972,208 TURBTs [228,207 (23%) with PDD and 744,001 (77%) with white light] were performed. Patients offered PDD during TURBT were younger ( < 0.001), presented fewer comorbidities ( < 0.001) and were discharged earlier from hospital ( < 0.001). PDD was associated with additional costs of about EUR 500 compared to white-light TURBT ( < 0.001). The yearly TURBT cases remained relatively stable from 2010 to 2021, whereas utilization of PDD underwent a 2-fold increase. After adjusting for major risk factors in the multivariate regression analysis, PDD was related to lower rates of transfusion (1.4% vs. 5.6%, OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.31, < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (0.7% vs. 1.4%, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.59, < 0.001) and 30-day in-hospital mortality (0.1% vs. 0.7%, OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.27, < 0.001) compared to white-light TURBT. On the contrary, PDD was related to clinically insignificant higher rates of bladder perforation (0.6% versus 0.5%, OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.4, < 0.001), and reoperation (2.6% versus 2.3%, OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.2, < 0.001). The utilization of PDD with TURBT is steadily increasing. Nevertheless, the road toward the establishment of PDD as the standard of care for TURBT is still long, despite of the advantages of PDD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11204857PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123531DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pdd
13
0001
9
perioperative outcomes
8
transurethral resection
8
resection bladder
8
photodynamic diagnosis
8
german nationwide
8
nationwide inpatient
8
inpatient data
8
turbt
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!