AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates the effectiveness of portable MRI (pMRI) in diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients with optic neuritis, comparing it to conventional MRI (cMRI) in terms of lesion detection and time to imaging.
  • Twenty patients were assessed, with results showing that while pMRI detected fewer lesions, it provided faster imaging results than cMRI, significantly reducing the wait time from symptom onset.
  • The findings indicate that pMRI has good diagnostic potential, particularly in terms of speed, but shows moderate sensitivity for identifying dissemination in space (DIS) according to established criteria.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Low-field 64 mT portable brain MRI has recently shown diagnostic promise for MS. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of portable MRI (pMRI) in assessing dissemination in space (DIS) in patients presenting with optic neuritis and determine whether deploying pMRI in the MS clinic can shorten the time from symptom onset to MRI.

Materials And Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with optic neuritis referred to a tertiary academic MS center from July 2022 to January 2024 underwent both point-of-care pMRI and subsequent 3T conventional MRI (cMRI). Images were evaluated for periventricular (PV), juxtacortical (JC), and infratentorial (IT) lesions. DIS was determined on brain MRI per 2017 McDonald criteria. Test characteristics were computed by using cMRI as the reference. Interrater and intermodality agreement between pMRI and cMRI were evaluated by using the Cohen κ. Time from symptom onset to pMRI and cMRI during the study period was compared with the preceding 1.5 years before pMRI implementation by using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests.

Results: Twenty patients (median age: 32.5 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 28-40]; 80% women) were included, of whom 9 (45%) and 5 (25%) had DIS on cMRI and pMRI, respectively. Median time interval between pMRI and cMRI was 7 days (IQR, 3.5-12.5). Interrater agreement was very good for PV (95%, κ = 0.89), and good for JC and IT lesions (90%, κ = 0.69 for both). Intermodality agreement was good for PV (90%, κ = 0.80) and JC (85%, κ = 0.63), and moderate for IT lesions (75%, κ = 0.42) and DIS (80%, κ = 0.58). pMRI had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100% for DIS. The median time from symptom onset to pMRI was significantly shorter (8.5 days [IQR 7-12]) compared with the interval to cMRI before pMRI deployment (21 days [IQR 8-49],  = 50) and after pMRI deployment (15 days [IQR 12-29],  = 30) (both < .01). Time from symptom onset to cMRI in those periods was not significantly different (= .29).

Conclusions: In patients with optic neuritis, pMRI exhibited moderate concordance, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity for DIS compared with cMRI. Its integration into the MS clinic reduced the time from symptom onset to MRI. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of pMRI in expediting early MS diagnosis and as an imaging tool in resource-limited settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543069PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8395DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time symptom
20
symptom onset
20
optic neuritis
16
pmri
14
pmri cmri
12
cmri
9
low-field 64 mt
8
64 mt portable
8
portable mri
8
dissemination space
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!