[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases].

Rev Mal Respir

Oncologie médicale, centre hospitalier universitaire Nantes, Nantes université, Nantes, France; Nantes université, Inserm UMR 1307, CNRS UMR 6075, université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France. Electronic address:

Published: October 2024

Introduction: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

State Of The Art: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

Perspectives: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

Conclusions: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2024.05.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain metastases
20
first-line immunotherapy
12
nsclc patients
12
patients brain
12
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
immunotherapy combination
8
efficacy immunotherapy
8
brain
7

Similar Publications

Introduction: Stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with oligometastases is potentially curable by radical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for thoracic disease, including the primary lesion and lymph node metastases, combined with local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastases.

Methods: This was a multicenter Phase II trial for patients with Stage IV NSCLC with oligometastases for whom CRT for thoracic disease was feasible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have EGFR mutations and favorable performance status (PS). Despite increasing clinical data on osimertinib, evidence in patients with an impaired PS remains limited. Therefore, a multicenter phase II trial (OPEN/TORG2040) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and poor PS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody-drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • CheckMate 204 study found that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in high intracranial objective response rates (icORRs) for patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs), prompting a need for standardized response criteria.
  • Different assessment criteria (like mRECIST and volumetric measurements) showed higher icORRs and stronger correlations with progression-free survival (icPFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to RANO-BM and RECIST.
  • The analysis suggests that mRECIST and volumetric criteria are reliable scales for future MBM trials, and response can be effectively measured even in patients with small lesions (<10 mm).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The SEER Registry contains U.S. cancer statistics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!