AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study assessed the feasibility and safety of a new cancer treatment method called whole-body hyperthermia pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (WBH-PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
  • - Researchers reviewed data from 28 patients who underwent one cycle of traditional PIPAC before receiving multiple WBH-PIPAC treatments, finding no significant side effects from the hyperthermia process.
  • - Results showed that while there were minor postoperative complications in some patients, the overall safety and effectiveness of WBH-PIPAC were similar to that of conventional PIPAC treatments.

Article Abstract

Background/aim: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of whole-body hyperthermia pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (WBH-PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.

Patients And Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed a database of 28 patients who had received one cycle of normothermic PIPAC prior to repetitive WBH-PIPACs. WBH (39-40°C) was induced using a Water-filtered infrared A device. Doxorubicin plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin was nebulized into a constant capnoperitoneum of 20 mmHg for 30 min at doses of 6.0 mg, 30.0 mg, or 120 mg per m body surface area, respectively. The primary outcome measures were feasibility and perioperative complications.

Results: The median age was 62 years (range=45-78 years). Primary tumor sites included the upper gastrointestinal tract (n=9), colon/rectum (n=7), hepato-pancreato-biliary system (n=3), peritoneum (n=2), ovaries (n=2), and unknown primary (n=5). The induction of WBH failed in one patient (6 liters ascites). After a median warming period of 95 min (53-117 min), the median rectal temperature (T) was 39.5°C (39.2-39.9°C). No hyperthermia-related side effects were observed. Twenty-seven patients received 50 WBH-PIPACs. The median time of therapeutic capnoperitoneum and treatment time with T ≥39°C was 39 min (37-43 min) and 66 min (53-69 min), respectively. The overall rate of postoperative procedure-related complications was 9/50, including seven grade I and two grade II complications. There were no grade III-V complications.

Conclusion: In a highly selected group of patients, the feasibility and perioperative safety of WBH-PIPAC was comparable to normothermic PIPAC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

whole-body hyperthermia
8
hyperthermia pressurized
8
pressurized intraperitoneal
8
intraperitoneal aerosol
8
aerosol chemotherapy
8
chemotherapy wbh-pipac
8
peritoneal surface
8
patients received
8
normothermic pipac
8
feasibility perioperative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!