AI Article Synopsis
- Qualitative research is essential in rehabilitation sciences due to its diverse questions and perspectives, but assessing its quality remains challenging.
- There is ongoing debate over universally applicable quality criteria for qualitative studies, prompting the need for clear standards for researchers and stakeholders.
- The article discusses core quality criteria specific to rehabilitation research and illustrates their practical application through real-world examples.
Article Abstract
Considering the variety of research questions, perspectives, and disciplines involved, qualitative studies have become an integral part of rehabilitation sciences. To ensure and estimate their quality and thus the significance of their results, criteria are needed for both researchers and recipients. Due to the specific nature and the heterogeneity of qualitative research approaches, there is still disagreement regarding appropriate universally valid quality criteria. In this article, core criteria that can be used to plan, conduct and receive qualitative studies are presented and discussed with reference to national rehabilitation research. For this purpose, the specific characteristics of rehabilitation research are taken into account and the application of quality criteria is illustrated using concrete examples from the research practice of rehabilitation sciences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2300-3606 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!