AI Article Synopsis

  • The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in urology aims to enhance diagnostic processes and improve prognosis for patients, particularly those with urolithiasis who are at risk for serious infections.
  • A systematic scoping review was conducted to evaluate existing literature on AI applications for predicting infectious complications in urolithiasis, yielding nine relevant studies from an initial search of 467 articles, primarily published between 2021 and 2023.
  • The reviewed studies showed promising results, with AI models like random forests and neural networks demonstrating superior performance in predicting infections compared to traditional methods, although further research and validation are necessary before widespread clinical implementation.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the new frontier in urology; they can assist the diagnostic work-up and in prognostication bring superior to the existing nomograms. Infectious events and in particular the septic risk, are one of the most common and in some cases life threatening complication in patients with urolithiasis. We performed a scoping review to provide an overview of the current application of AI in prediction the infectious complications in patients affected by urolithiasis.

Evidence Acquisition: A systematic scoping review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines by screening Medline, PubMed, and Embase to detect pertinent studies.

Evidence Synthesis: A total of 467 articles were found, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were considered. All studies are retrospective and published between 2021 and 2023. Only two studies performed an external validation of the described models. The main event considered is urosepsis in four articles, urinary tract infection in two articles and diagnosis of infection stones in three articles. Different AI models were trained, each of which exploited several types and numbers of variables. All studies reveal good performance. Random forest and artificial neural networks seem to have higher AUC, specificity and sensibility and perform better than the traditional statistical analysis.

Conclusions: Further prospective and multi-institutional studies with external validation are needed to better clarify which variables and AI models should be integrated in our clinical practice to predict infectious events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05686-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoping review
12
infectious events
8
external validation
8
application urolithiasis
4
urolithiasis risk
4
risk infection
4
scoping
4
infection scoping
4
review introduction
4
introduction artificial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!