Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Objectives: This study presents results from a survey of physicians performing electrodiagnostic studies to assess average volume. We also assessed how different factors (trainees, technologists, age of the physician, and case complexity) affected volume. Productivity is an important factor for physicians across practice settings. However, unlike evaluation and management services for neurologists, there are no published data for benchmarks of average volume of electrodiagnostic studies.
Methods: A 34-question survey was designed collecting information on demographics, electrodiagnostic study volume, technologists, trainees, referrals, and case complexity. The anonymous survey was disseminated through a QR code or hyperlink to multiple online neurology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, electromyography, and neuromuscular forums. The primary outcome was EMG volume including number of EMGs per half-day and EMG volume per year. We conducted bivariate association analysis between primary outcomes and respondent characteristics using the Pearson χ test. Multivariable regression models determined factors associated with each of our outcome variables.
Results: A total of 201 respondents initiated the survey. 71% were certified in adult neurology, 19.6% in physical medicine and rehabilitation, and 2.7% in pediatric neurology. 37.5% practiced in academic medicine. The remaining respondents were from private practice, group, solo, hospital employed, or other. 83% of respondents allotted a dedicated half-day to performing EMGs. The median number of EMGs scheduled during a half-day was within 3-4 (45%). 30% and 7% scheduled 5-6 or more than 7 patients per half-day, respectively. The median number of EMGs performed per year was within 251-500 (37%).
Discussion: This national, cross-sectional survey evaluates average metrics of EMG volume. Our survey showed that the median number of EMGs annually lies between 251 and 500 studies (37%). In addition, for those respondents who allotted a dedicated half-day to performing EMGs, the median number of EMG studies scheduled per half-day lies between 3 and 4 studies (45%). In multivariate analysis, respondent characteristics of age of the physician (older than 45), working with nerve conduction technologists, and holding the position of EMG director were associated with increased EMG volume.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194787 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200333 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!